A short version of the questionnaire of metamemory in Adulthood (MIA) in Portuguese

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.creatorCampelo, Gabriela-
Autor(es): dc.creatorZortea, Maxciel-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSaraiva, Renan-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMachado, Wagner-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSbicigo, Juliana Burges-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSegabinazi, Joice Dickel-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGastal, Camila-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCastilho, Goiara Mendonça de-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSalles, Jerusa Fumagalli-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2021-10-14T17:21:40Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2021-10-14T17:21:40Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2017-12-07-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2017-12-07-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2016-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/30181-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0043-7-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/capes/606049-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe aim of this study was to develop a short version of the Metamemory in Adulthood Questionnaire (MIA) in Brazilian Portuguese. The original MIA is an instrument in english composed by 108 items, divided into seven dimensions of metamemory (Strategy, Task, Capacity, Change, Anxiety, Achievement and Locus). Despite of being widely used, the extension of the instrument makes its application impractical in many contexts, reinforcing the need for a short version. A total of 472 participants answered the original full version of the MIA. First, Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses revealed that nine items of the instrument could be excluded due to poor infit and outfit values. After exploratory factor analyses, the 99 items left were judged by five experts that chose the most appropriate items following previously established criteria (factor loading, repetitiveness, bad writing, and temporal/cultural inadequacy). A 39-items version (MIAr) was obtained, with the same factorial structure of the original MIA. The MIAr demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency indexes, as well as evidences of convergent validity and validity based on the response process. The results revealed that the MIAr achieved good psychometric properties, serving as a more parsimonious and practical option for metamemory assessment.-
Formato: dc.formatapplication/pdf-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Publicador: dc.publisherCurso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul-
Direitos: dc.rightsAcesso Aberto-
Direitos: dc.rightsPsicologia: Reflexão e Crítica - This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0). Fonte: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722016000103117&lng=en&nrm=iso. Acesso em: 7 mar. 2018.-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectMemória-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectPsicometria-
Título: dc.titleA short version of the questionnaire of metamemory in Adulthood (MIA) in Portuguese-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional – UNB

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.