Technologies for fertilizers and management strategies of N-fertilization in coffee cropping systems to reduce ammonia losses by volatilization

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.creatorFreitas, Tainah-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBartelega, Lucas-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSantos, César-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDutra, Mateus Portes-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSarkis, Leonardo Fernandes-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGuimarães, Rubens José-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDominghetti, Anderson William-
Autor(es): dc.creatorZito, Pauliana Cristina-
Autor(es): dc.creatorFernandes, Tales Jesus-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGuelfi, Douglas-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2026-02-09T12:50:24Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2026-02-09T12:50:24Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-02-12-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-02-12-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-11-30-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.ufla.br/handle/1/56010-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/capes/1169278-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe aim of this study was to quantify NH3-N losses from conventional, stabilized, slow-release, and controlled-release N fertilizers in a coffee field. The N fertilizers analyzed were prilled urea, prilled urea dissolved in water, ammonium sulfate (AS), ammonium nitrate (AN), urea + Cu + B, urea + adhesive + CaCO3, and urea + NBPT (all with three split applications), as well as blended N fertilizer, urea + elastic resin, urea-formaldehyde, and urea + polyurethane (all applied only once). NH3-N losses (mean of two crop seasons) were statistically higher for urea + adhesive + CaCO3 (27.9% of applied N) in comparison with the other treatments. Loss from prilled urea (23.7%) was less than from urea + adhesive + CaCO3. Losses from urea + NBPT (14.5%) and urea + Cu + B (13.5%) were similar and lower than those from prilled urea. Urea dissolved in water (4.2%) had even lower losses than those treatments, and the lowest losses were observed for AS (0.6%) and AN (0.5%). For the single application fertilizers, higher losses occurred for urea + elastic resin (5.8%), blended N fertilizer (5.5%), and urea + polyurethane (5.2%); and urea-formaldehyde had a lower loss (0.5%). Except for urea + adhesive + CaCO3, all N-fertilizer technologies reduced NH3-N losses compared to prilled urea.-
Formato: dc.formatapplication/pdf-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Publicador: dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)-
Direitos: dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International-
Direitos: dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International-
Direitos: dc.rightsacesso aberto-
Direitos: dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
Direitos: dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
???dc.source???: dc.sourcePlants-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectN-fertilizers-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectNH3 emission-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectUrease inhibitors-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSlow- and controlled-release N-fertilizers-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCoffea arabica-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSustainable agriculture-
Título: dc.titleTechnologies for fertilizers and management strategies of N-fertilization in coffee cropping systems to reduce ammonia losses by volatilization-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typeArtigo-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Lavras (RIUFLA)

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.