Tradition vs. innovation: comparing bioacoustics and mist-net results to bat sampling

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.creatorMancini, Matheus Camargo Silva-
Autor(es): dc.creatorHintze, Frederico-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLaurindo, Rafael de Souza-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMello, Rodrigo de Macêdo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGregorin, Renato-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2026-02-09T11:36:40Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2026-02-09T11:36:40Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-07-08-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-07-08-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.ufla.br/handle/1/50507-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09524622.2021.2008494-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/capes/1143479-
Descrição: dc.descriptionBats are a complex and diverse group, making their study remarkably challenging. Several methods allow the study of bats, e.g. mist-nets and acoustic monitoring (AM). We compare the use of AM and mist-nets to inventory bats in a mountainous region of São Paulo state, Brazil. We provide a species list for the study area based on species registered with both methodologies, comparing with a species list known for the state, obtained from the literature. We calculated beta diversity between methodologies to evaluate the dissimilarity in species composition sampled with these methods. We also performed a PCA to evaluate if the bat fauna sampled with AM showed species-habitat associations. We recorded 15 species/sonotypes through AM and 22 species through mist-nets. Beta diversity revealed 97% of dissimilarity in species composition. The turnover component explained 96% of this dissimilarity. PCA revealed that Vespertilionidae bats were associated with border/cluttered habitats, while Molossidae bats were present in all habitat types. The species list for the state comprises eighty species. Our inventory recorded more than 25% of this fauna. Mist-nets are efficient for sampling low-flying/low-intensity echolocating bats. AM is crucial for sampling high-flying/high-intensity echolocating bats. This is the second study to use AM to inventory bats in this state.-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Publicador: dc.publisherTaylor & Francis-
Direitos: dc.rightsrestrictAccess-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceBioacoustics: The International Journal of Animal Sound and its Recording-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectBat richness-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSampling methodologies-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSeasonality-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSerra da Mantiqueira-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSoutheastern Brazil-
Título: dc.titleTradition vs. innovation: comparing bioacoustics and mist-net results to bat sampling-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typeArtigo-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Lavras (RIUFLA)

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.