
Atenção:
O eduCAPES é um repositório de objetos educacionais, não sendo responsável por materiais de terceiros submetidos na plataforma. O usuário assume ampla e total responsabilidade quanto à originalidade, à titularidade e ao conteúdo, citações de obras consultadas, referências e outros elementos que fazem parte do material que deseja submeter. Recomendamos que se reporte diretamente ao(s) autor(es), indicando qual parte do material foi considerada imprópria (cite página e parágrafo) e justificando sua denúncia.
Caso seja o autor original de algum material publicado indevidamente ou sem autorização, será necessário que se identifique informando nome completo, CPF e data de nascimento. Caso possua uma decisão judicial para retirada do material, solicitamos que informe o link de acesso ao documento, bem como quaisquer dados necessários ao acesso, no campo abaixo.
Todas as denúncias são sigilosas e sua identidade será preservada. Os campos nome e e-mail são de preenchimento opcional. Porém, ao deixar de informar seu e-mail, um possível retorno será inviabilizado e/ou sua denúncia poderá ser desconsiderada no caso de necessitar de informações complementares.
| Metadados | Descrição | Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| Autor(es): dc.creator | Trindade, Aline Bhering | - |
| Autor(es): dc.creator | Renó, Maria Luiza Grillo | - |
| Autor(es): dc.creator | Rúa Orozco, Dimas José | - |
| Autor(es): dc.creator | Reyes, Arnaldo Martín Martinez | - |
| Autor(es): dc.creator | Julio, Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano | - |
| Autor(es): dc.creator | Palacio, José Carlos Escobar | - |
| Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-09T11:19:14Z | - |
| Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available | 2026-02-09T11:19:14Z | - |
| Data de envio: dc.date.issued | 2022-05-06 | - |
| Data de envio: dc.date.issued | 2022-05-06 | - |
| Data de envio: dc.date.issued | 2021-08 | - |
| Fonte completa do material: dc.identifier | https://repositorio.ufla.br/handle/1/49883 | - |
| Fonte completa do material: dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114230 | - |
| Fonte: dc.identifier.uri | http://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/capes/1138366 | - |
| Descrição: dc.description | When analysing multi-product systems, the allocation of resources and waste in a Life Cycle Assessment presents a difficulty. This can be solved through thermoeconomic approaches. Thus, the objective of the present work was to carry out a comparative analysis between traditional methods, recommended by ISO 14000, and thermoeconomic methods in the Life Cycle Assessment of a cogeneration system composed of a gas microturbine and lithium bromide–water absorption systems. First, the system's total emissions were calculated, and then the allocation of resources was carried out. This allocation was achieved in three ways: traditional allocation, thermoeconomic allocation, and allocation through exergoenvironmental analysis. To carry out the last two allocations, the exergetic costs were calculated considering the physical structure and the productive structure of the production flows (using four different exergy breakdown models,). And with the result of the exergetic costs, the environmental impacts (environmental costs) were calculated through the thermoeconomic allocation and the exergoenvironmental analysis. The environmental impacts (environmental costs) found with allocations that use thermoeconomics were compared with those obtained by the Life Cycle Assessment with the traditional allocation (energetic and exergetic). Thus, it was found that the results obtained by the energy allocation and the allocation that uses the thermoeconomic model of total exergy have the highest environmental impact over the cold production. It was also found that there is no difference between using an exergetic allocation or thermoeconomic allocation if the system does not have many dissipative components, such as valves, and there is no need to know the influence of the components on the final environmental impact since both perform the same calculations with very few modifications. It was concluded that, when performing a thermoeconomic analysis on a system with valves, one can use any of the models studied, depending on how detailed one wants the results of their environmental impact to be. On the other hand, if the system does not contain many dissipative elements or one does not need a detailed result, one should just make the traditional exergy allocation. Moreover, if it is necessary to know which component has the greatest environmental impact, the exergoenvironmental analysis should be used. Thus, this work contributes to a compilation of all the thermodynamic models used to date, and how they can be applied in a Life Cycle Assessment to generate more detailed results. | - |
| Idioma: dc.language | en | - |
| Publicador: dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
| Direitos: dc.rights | restrictAccess | - |
| ???dc.source???: dc.source | Energy Conversion and Management | - |
| Palavras-chave: dc.subject | Thermoeconomics | - |
| Palavras-chave: dc.subject | Life cycle assessment | - |
| Palavras-chave: dc.subject | Cogeneration | - |
| Palavras-chave: dc.subject | ISO 14000 | - |
| Palavras-chave: dc.subject | Termoeconomia | - |
| Palavras-chave: dc.subject | Avaliação do Ciclo de Vida (ACV) | - |
| Palavras-chave: dc.subject | Cogeração | - |
| Título: dc.title | Comparative analysis of different cost allocation methodologies in LCA for cogeneration systems | - |
| Tipo de arquivo: dc.type | Artigo | - |
| Aparece nas coleções: | Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Lavras (RIUFLA) | |
O Portal eduCAPES é oferecido ao usuário, condicionado à aceitação dos termos, condições e avisos contidos aqui e sem modificações. A CAPES poderá modificar o conteúdo ou formato deste site ou acabar com a sua operação ou suas ferramentas a seu critério único e sem aviso prévio. Ao acessar este portal, você, usuário pessoa física ou jurídica, se declara compreender e aceitar as condições aqui estabelecidas, da seguinte forma: