Performance evaluation of two SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM rapid tests (Covid-Presto and NG-Test) and one IgG automated immunoassay (Abbott)

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.creatorCharpentier, Charlotte-
Autor(es): dc.creatorIchou, Houria-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDamond, Florence-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBouvet, Elisabeth-
Autor(es): dc.creatorChaix, Marie-Laure-
Autor(es): dc.creatorFerré, Valentine-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDelaugerre, Constance-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMahjoub, Nadia-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLarrouy, Lucile-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLe Hingrat, Quentin-
Autor(es): dc.creatorVisseaux, Benoit-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMackiewicz, Vincent-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDescamps, Diane-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDescamps, Diane-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2026-02-09T11:17:22Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2026-02-09T11:17:22Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-10-08-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-10-08-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-10-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.ufla.br/handle/1/43360-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653220303607-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/capes/1137674-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe aim of this study was to assess the analytical performances, sensitivity and specificity, of two rapid tests (Covid- Presto® test rapid Covid-19 IgG/IgM and NG-Test® IgM-IgG COVID-19) and one automated immunoassay (Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG) for detecting anti- SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. This study was performed with: (i) a positive panel constituted of 88 SARS-CoV-2 specimens collected from patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, and (ii) a negative panel of 120 serum samples, all collected before November 2019, including 64 samples with a cross-reactivity panel. Sensitivity of Covid-Presto® test for IgM and IgG was 78.4% and 92.0%, respectively. Sensitivity of NG-Test® for IgM and IgG was 96.6% and 94.9%, respectively. Sensitivity of Abbott IgG assay was 96.5% showing an excellent agreement with the two rapid tests (κ = 0.947 and κ = 0.936 for NGTest ® and Covid-Presto® test, respectively). An excellent agreement was also observed between the two rapid tests (κ = 0.937). Specificity for IgM was 100% and 86.5% for Covid-Presto® test and NG-Test®, respectively. Specificity for IgG was 92.0%, 94.9% and 96.5% for Covid-Presto®, NGTest ®, and Abbott, respectively. Most of the false positive results observed with NG-Test® resulted from samples containing malarial antibodies. In conclusion, performances of these 2 rapid tests are very good and comparable to those obtained with automated immunoassay, except for IgM specificity with the NG-Test®. Thus, isolated IgM should be cautiously interpreted due to the possible false-positive reactions with this test. Finally, before their large use, the rapid tests must be reliably evaluated with adequate and large panel including early seroconversion and possible cross-reactive samples.-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Publicador: dc.publisherElsevier-
Direitos: dc.rightsrestrictAccess-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceJournal of Clinical Virology-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSerology-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectRapid test-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCross-reactivity-
Título: dc.titlePerformance evaluation of two SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM rapid tests (Covid-Presto and NG-Test) and one IgG automated immunoassay (Abbott)-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typeArtigo-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Lavras (RIUFLA)

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.