What's wrong with the counterfactual-based objection to CORNEA?

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.creatorMerlussi, Pedro-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMiranda, Sérgio Ricardo Neves de-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T15:37:23Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T15:37:23Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2025-07-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/20664-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-024-04732-7-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04732-7-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/capes/1019981-
Descrição: dc.descriptionOne important objection to the Condition Of ReasonNable Epistemic Access (CORNEA) is that it is incompatible with inductive evidence. This objection, however, relies on a counterfactual interpretation of CORNEA, and Wykstra and Perrine have shown that CORNEA need not be interpreted in that way, but rather in terms of conditional probability. Here, we show that there is an important gap in this recent response to the counterfactual-based criticism of CORNEA. We argue that the main response to this criticism ultimately depends on a specific semantics forcounterfactual conditionals. More specifically, it ultimately depends on the denial of the conditional excludedmiddleprinciple.Wetheninvestigateandsuggestahithertounknowndefense of CORNEA’s counterfactual interpretation.-
Formato: dc.formatapplication/pdf-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Direitos: dc.rightsrestrito-
Título: dc.titleWhat's wrong with the counterfactual-based objection to CORNEA?-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - UFOP

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.