Learning from Anselm ́s Argument.

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.creatorMurcho, Desidério Orlando Figueiredo-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T15:36:04Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T15:36:04Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-08-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-08-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/15137-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2021.V44N4.DM-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/capes/1019419-
Descrição: dc.descriptionAnselm’s original argument for the existence of God seems to pull in opposite directions. On the one hand, it is not easy to see what, if anything, is wrong with it; on the other, it seems incredible that the existence of a being like God could be proved entirely a priori. This paper presents a diagnosis of what seems to be wrong with Anselm’s original reasoning. The diagno- sis is general enough to be of use elsewhere, and it is this: concep- tual possibilities are inferential dead-ends, not free inference tick- ets to prove any substantial claim. It remains to be seen if other versions of Anselm’s original insight, both contemporary and not, fall into the same conceptual possibility trap.-
Formato: dc.formatapplication/pdf-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Direitos: dc.rightsaberto-
Direitos: dc.rightsThis document is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (CC-BY-NC). Fonte: o PDF do artigo.-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectOntological argument-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectConceptual possibility-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectGod-
Título: dc.titleLearning from Anselm ́s Argument.-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - UFOP

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.