Tresca Versus Von Mises: Which Failure Criterion is More Conservative in a Probabilistic Context?

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorRio de Janeiro State University-
Autor(es): dc.contributorTexas Tech University-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity of Salerno-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCunha, Americo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorYanik, Yasar-
Autor(es): dc.creatorOlivieri, Carlo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorda Silva, Samuel-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T21:05:42Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T21:05:42Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2025-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2024-10-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4063894-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/308858-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/308858-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThis tutorial examines the failure theories of Tresca and von Mises, both of which are crucial for designing metallic structures. Conventionally, Tresca is regarded as more conservative than von Mises from a deterministic perspective. This tutorial, however, introduces a different viewpoint, presenting a scenario where von Mises’ theory may appear more conservative when variability in the mechanical system parameters is considered. This often-overlooked aspect is not extensively addressed in standard textbooks on solid mechanics and the strength of materials. The tutorial aims to shed light on the non-negligible probability where von Mises’ criterion yields a smaller equivalent stress than Tresca, thus being more conservative. It underscores the importance of integrating probabilistic considerations into stress analyses of solids, offering valuable insights for the education of structural mechanics. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4063894]-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Applied Mathematics Rio de Janeiro State University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Texas Tech University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Civil Engineering University of Salerno-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Mechanical Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Mechanical Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP)-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationJournal of Applied Mechanics-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectelasticity-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectfailure criteria-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectmaterial failure theories-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectprobabilistic design-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectstress analysis-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectTresca criterion-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectuncertainty quantification-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectvon Mises criterion-
Título: dc.titleTresca Versus Von Mises: Which Failure Criterion is More Conservative in a Probabilistic Context?-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.