Implant digital impression accuracy using extraoral scanners: a three-dimensional analysis

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity Center of Araraquara (UNIARA)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGomes, Grazielle Franco-
Autor(es): dc.creatorAroni, Mónica Estefanía Tinajero-
Autor(es): dc.creatorOliveira, Lucas Portela-
Autor(es): dc.creatorFilho, João Neudenir Arioli-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBinda, Carolina Mollo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Assis Mollo, Francisco-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T21:58:08Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T21:58:08Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2025-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.20396/BJOS.V22I00.8668354-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/308089-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/308089-
Descrição: dc.descriptionAim: To analyze the accuracy of extraoral systems (Ceramill Map400+, AutoScan-DS200+, and E2) in full implantprosthetic rehabilitation three-dimensionally. Methods: A metallic edentulous maxilla with four implants was digitalized by a contact scanner (MDX-40 - Roland, control) and used as a control image to compare with other images generated by three laboratory scanners (10 samples per group). Letters identified all the four components: A and D angled 45º, and B and C parallel. The BioCAD software exported the images (.STL) to compare and verify deviations of the analogs on the X, Y, and Z axes. The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test and the two-way ANOVA on ranks with a post hoc Tukey test analyzed the data with 5% significance. Results: No statistical differences were observed in the accuracy between the extraoral scanners (p=0.0806). However, when analyzing only the components, component D was more accurate when scanned with Ceramill Map400+ compared with AutoScan DS200+ (p<0.001) and with E2 (p=0.002). Conclusions: All extraoral systems assessed showed digitalization accuracy but with more deviations in angled implants. The Ceramill Map400+ scanner showed the best results for the digital impression of a complete arch.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Health Sciences Implantology Post Graduation Course Dental School University Center of Araraquara (UNIARA), São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCAPES: #2019/22509-9-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDental implants-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDental impression technique-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDental prosthesis-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectimplant-supported-
Título: dc.titleImplant digital impression accuracy using extraoral scanners: a three-dimensional analysis-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.