Could Marginal Adaptation of Composite Resin Restorations Be Influenced by a Different Polymer Using Different Techniques?

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity of Southern Santa Catarina-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPereira, Jefferson Ricardo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorVermudt, Alef-
Autor(es): dc.creatorJunior, Ageu Raupp-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBordignon, Diego Saccon-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMedeiros, Henrique Vieira-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGalvani, Lucas David-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRosa, Ricardo Abreu da-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSó, Marcus Vinicius Reis-
Autor(es): dc.creatorKuga, Milton Carlos-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T15:56:00Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T15:56:00Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2025-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2024-11-30-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings14121618-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/307009-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/307009-
Descrição: dc.descriptionBackground: Marginal adaptation is one of biggest challenges in restorative dentistry, mainly in restoration of composite resin. Even with development of lower shrinkage materials, like those which use the polymer silorane, it is necessary a faithful clinical protocol in order to obtain better results and more clinical durability of restorative procedure. The purpose of this study was investigated if different polymers can influence on marginal adaptation of different composite resin restorations. Material and methods: Twenty class V cavities were confectioned in twenty human molars in a standardized way. Ten dentists received one tooth each and a questionnaire to describe their own clinical protocol. The other 10 teeth were restored by one researcher as control group. The cavities received the adhesive system than increments of composite resin, and so the restorations were finished with finishing bur (KG Sorensen, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) to remove the excess, followed by sof-lex discs (3M ESPE). After this stage, all of specimens were embedded in 1% Methylene blue (Prolabo, Paris, France) during 48 h. The evaluation of pigment penetration into the interfaces was performed after specimens were washed in distilled water and longitudinally sectioned with steel Diamond disc in low velocity. Results: There was significant statistical difference between the different techniques using compose resin. Conclusions: it was possible conclude that the clinical protocol to perform dental restoration interfere dramatically in the final results of restorative procedure.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionPostgraduate Program of Health Sciences University of Southern Santa Catarina-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry São Paulo State University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartament of Endodontics Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry São Paulo State University-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationCoatings-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectbisgma-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectcomposite resin-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectdental materials-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectdental restoration-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectmarginal adaptation-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectpolymers-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectsilorane-
Título: dc.titleCould Marginal Adaptation of Composite Resin Restorations Be Influenced by a Different Polymer Using Different Techniques?-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.