Efficacy of different in-office treatments for dentin hypersensitivity: randomized and parallel clinical trial

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRamos, Fernanda de Souza e Silva-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBriso, André Luiz Fraga-
Autor(es): dc.creatorAlbertinazzi, Larissa-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMarchetti, Vitória Marega-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSouza, Marina Trevelin-
Autor(es): dc.creatorFagundes, Ticiane Cestari-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T19:01:14Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T19:01:14Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2025-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202405487-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/306149-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/306149-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe aim of this clinical, prospective, randomized, and parallel study was to evaluate different in-office treatments for dentin hypersensitivity (DH). One hundred ninety-two teeth with non-cavitated root exposures were treated using different desensitizers: fluoride varnish (Duraphat – FLU); bioactive ceramic solution (Biosilicate-BIOS); universal self-etching adhesive (Single Bond Universal – SBU); bioactive photoactivated varnish (PRG filler-SPRG). The degree of DH was analyzed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and computerized visual scale (CoVAS), before treatments and after 7, 15, and 30 days from the first session. Comparisons among desensitizers were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests. Friedman test was used to compare between times (p ≤ 0.05). Comparing desensitizers FLU presented a higher value of DH than BIOS using VAS at 7 days, however, no differences were found using CoVAS analysis. Comparing times, BIOS and SBU showed a reduction in DH after 7 days and SBU showed a reduction at 30 days compared to 7 days using VAS. FLU and SPRG groups reduced DH from 15 days to 30 days using VAS. There was a reduction in DH for FLU, BIOS, and SBU after 7 days and for BIOS this reduction also occurred at 30 days when compared to 15 days using CoVAS. SPRG group showed a reduction from 15 to 30 days. All desensitizers tested were able to reduce the initial sensitivity. The bioactive ceramic solution reduced the DH gradually after 30 days using computerized analysis.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionVitreous Materials Laboratory Department of Materials Engineering Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFAPESP: 2020/07443-9-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationBrazilian Dental Journal-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectClinical Trial-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDentin Desensitizing Agents-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDentin Sensitivity-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectRandomized Clinical Trial-
Título: dc.titleEfficacy of different in-office treatments for dentin hypersensitivity: randomized and parallel clinical trial-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.