Influence of Different Immersion Solutions and Polishing Protocols on the Roughness of Conventional and CAD/CAM Restorative Materials

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorFederal University of Piauí-
Autor(es): dc.contributorNational University of San Marcos-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity of Toronto-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLorenzetti, Camila Cruz-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSilva, Aryvelto Miranda-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCastro-Núñez, Gabriela Mariana-
Autor(es): dc.creatorViola, Kennia Scapin-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBortolatto, Janaína Freitas-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Campos, Edson Alves-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSaad, José Roberto Cury-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T15:13:05Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T15:13:05Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2025-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2024-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2025.088-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/305594-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/305594-
Descrição: dc.descriptionObjective: To evaluate the effects of immersion solutions and polishing protocols on the surface roughness of different restorative materials. Material and Methods: Specimens from composite resin (CR) (Filtek Z350 XT) and CAD-CAM blocks of resin nanoceramic (NC) (Lava Ultimate Restorative), hybrid ceramic (HC) (Enamic), and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZL) (Celtra Duo) were assigned to two protocols: only polishing rubbers (PR) (Ceramisté rubbers®) or PR + paste (Porcelize®) (PR+P). Surface roughness was measured before (T0), after 30 days (T1), and 60 days (T2) of immersion in solutions of artificial saliva (SA), coffee (CF), and Coca-Cola® (CO). Roughness changes were compared using ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05). Results: Time (p≤0.003) and the interaction of time and immersion solution (p≤0.03) significantly affected all materials. The interaction of time, immersion solution, and polishing significantly affected ZL (p=0.003) and NC (p=0.013). The highest surface roughness values were observed with CF solution at T2. Conclusion: Different polishing protocols did not significantly affect the restorative materials tested. The CF solution affected the surface roughness of composite resin and feldspathic-composite hybrid ceramic after 60 days, regardless of the polishing protocol. The effects of immersion solutions and polishing protocols vary and depend on the properties of each restorative material.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionGraduate Program in Dentistry Federal University of Piauí, PI-
Descrição: dc.descriptionRehabilitative Stomatology of Dentistry Department National University of San Marcos-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFaculty of Dentistry University of Toronto-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, SP-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationPesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCeramics-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectComposite Resins-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectComputer-Aided Design-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDental Polishing-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSurface Properties-
Título: dc.titleInfluence of Different Immersion Solutions and Polishing Protocols on the Roughness of Conventional and CAD/CAM Restorative Materials-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.