The impact of using pain scales by untrained students on the decision to provide analgesia to multiple species

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorNorth Carolina State University (NCSU)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorOliveira, Marcela Carneiro de-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Lima, Mayara Travalini-
Autor(es): dc.creatorTrindade, Pedro Henrique Esteves-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLuna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T21:16:12Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T21:16:12Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2025-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2024-09-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2024.06.010-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/303778-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/303778-
Descrição: dc.descriptionObjective: To evaluate if students without training assess pain similarly to an expert, and to compare indications for analgesic intervention based on student opinions versus scale scoring. Study design: Prospective, blind, randomized, cross-sectional study. Animals: Video recordings of a bull, horse, cat, pig and sheep. Methods: First-year veterinary medicine students assessed one video of a horse (n = 44) and one video of a bull (n = 39). Third-year veterinary medicine students assessed one video of a cat (n = 23) and one video of a pig (n = 21). Fourth-year animal science students (n = 16) assessed one video of a sheep. The species assessed by different student classes were determined randomly. Students were unaware of animal history or existing pain assessment and decided whether they would provide analgesia according to their opinion. They then scored each video using species-specific validated pain scales. Scores were compared with those of a board-certified anesthesiologist (expert). Chi-square test was used to compare students and expert. Results: Students underestimated the expert's score by 8–20%, except for the horse. There was no difference between the analgesic indication according to the assessment of the expert (143/143, 100%) and students (141/143, 98.6%) considering the defined analgesic intervention threshold for each scale (p = 0.478). The indication for analgesic intervention according to students’ opinion (116/143, 81.1%) was lower than that according to their scale scores (141/143, 98.6%) (p < 0.0001). Conclusions and clinical relevance: Students tended to underestimate pain; however, they detected pain that requires analgesic intervention in animals similarly to an expert. The use of scales optimized the indication for providing analgesia when animals were experiencing pain that required analgesic intervention.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Surgical Specialties and Anesthesiology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp), SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State University (NCSU)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction São Paulo State University (Unesp), SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Surgical Specialties and Anesthesiology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp), SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction São Paulo State University (Unesp), SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFAPESP: 2017/12815-0-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCNPq: 304701/2020-3-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCAPES: 88887.674152/2022-00-
Formato: dc.format548-557-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationVeterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectacute postoperative pain-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectanalgesia-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectanimal welfare-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectpain measurement-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectpostoperative care-
Título: dc.titleThe impact of using pain scales by untrained students on the decision to provide analgesia to multiple species-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.