Effects of assessment method (real-time versus video-recorded) on a validated pain-altered behavior scale used in castrated piglets

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorNorth Carolina State University (NCSU)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorTrindade, Pedro Henrique Esteves-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLopez-Soriano, Magdiel-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMerenda, Victoria Rocha-
Autor(es): dc.creatorTomacheuski, Rubia Mitalli-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPairis-Garcia, Monique Danielle-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T21:09:33Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T21:09:33Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2025-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-11-30-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45869-8-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/302718-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/302718-
Descrição: dc.descriptionWe aimed to compare two assessment methodologies (real-time vs. video-recorded) using the Unesp-Botucatu Pig Composite Acute Pain Scale (UPAPS) in piglets before and after castration. Twenty-nine male piglets were castrated. Four observers scored the UPAPS over three perioperative timepoints of castration following two assessment methodologies. In real-time assessments, the observers were in-person observing the piglets in front of the pen. After two weeks, the observers did video-recorded assessments randomizing piglets and timepoints. Modeling was conducted to compare the UPAPS and each pain-altered behavior between methodologies. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland–Altman, and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were conducted to investigate agreement between methodologies. UPAPS was statistically equivalent between methodologies (P = 0.4371). The ICC for each method was very good (0.85 to 0.91). The agreement of the UPAPS assessed between methodologies had minimal bias (− 0.04), no proportion bias, and 53% of the assessments presented a perfect agreement. However, CCC of the UPAPS was moderate (0.65), and only one pain-altered behavior (“presents difficulty in overcoming obstacles or other animals”) occurred more in real-time assessments (P = 0.0444). In conclusion, piglet pain assessment by UPAPS can be conducted in real-time based on a suitable agreement between the real-time and video-recorded assessment methods.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State University (NCSU)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionAnesthesiology Graduation Program Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionAnesthesiology Graduation Program Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationScientific Reports-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Título: dc.titleEffects of assessment method (real-time versus video-recorded) on a validated pain-altered behavior scale used in castrated piglets-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.