What do expert designers think? Heuristic evaluation of an inclusive instruction manual for people with hearing impairment

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMedina, Camila-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDomiciano, Cassia Leticia Carrara-
Autor(es): dc.creatorFerrari, Deborah Viviane-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T15:14:07Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T15:14:07Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2025-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-06-18-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.51358/id.v18i1.834-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/300267-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/300267-
Descrição: dc.descriptionHeuristic evaluation is an inspection method carried out by experts with objective of identifying problems in an interface, based on user’s needs and needs. It is based on practical knowledge and ongoing daily experience that can be applied to print media. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate, from the design perspective, a manual of hearing aids, previously analyzed by audiologists, elaborated according to the principles of Inclusive Graphic Design and Information Design. Five experienced designers participated in this evaluation, according to three phases: 1) preparation; 2) data collection and interpretation; and 3) consolidation and reporting of results. The evaluation had an online questionnaire, with questions related to design of each page of manual and 5 questions about guiding parameters for construction of it. The results show that average score obtained by manual pages was 3.7 (on a scale from one to five), considering it “efficient”. According to the evaluation of parameters, mean was 7 (on a scale from one to ten), organization of information obtained grade 7.4, typography, 6.6, layout 7 and illustrations 6. The overall quality of manual was classified with an average of 7.6. Thus, some comments were of great value and resulted in changes in project, especially regarding typography and organization of information. Evaluations of this nature demonstrate need to investigate graphic design aspects with professionals with practical and academic experience to detect possible flaws in the project.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartamento de Design da Faculdade de Arquitetura Artes Comunicação e Design-Universidade Estadual Paulista – FAAC-UNESP, SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia da Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru – Universidade de São Paulo – FOB-USP, SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartamento de Design da Faculdade de Arquitetura Artes Comunicação e Design-Universidade Estadual Paulista – FAAC-UNESP, SP-
Idioma: dc.languagept_BR-
Relação: dc.relationInfoDesign-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectHearing aids-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectHeuristic Evaluation-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectInclusive Graphic Design-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectInformation Design-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectInstruction Manual-
Título: dc.titleWhat do expert designers think? Heuristic evaluation of an inclusive instruction manual for people with hearing impairment-
Título: dc.titleO que pensam os designers especialistas? Avaliação heurística de um manual de instrução inclusivo para indivíduos com deficiência auditiva-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.