Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorNational Agrarian University La Molina-
Autor(es): dc.creatorTejada, Jorge Luis-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLemos, Leandro Borges-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSilva, Ebson-
Autor(es): dc.creatorAlves, Pedro Luís da Costa Aguiar-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T19:13:43Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T19:13:43Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2025-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/300113-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/300113-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe common bean has social, economic, culinary, and environmental relevance. Considering its low competitive capacity and the intensive use of herbicides, methods such as planting time can help in weed management. To determine the effect of the planting season on controlling weeds affecting common beans, an experiment was conducted during the summer planting and another in winter planting. For that seven incrementing periods were implemented: 0–10, 0–20, 0–30, 0–40, 0–50, 0–60 and 0–80 days after bean emergence with coexistence of weeds and the same periods with control of weeds, which established 14 treatments in four repetitions, under a random block design. Weeds were analyzed using a phytosociological method and their dry mass with yield examined by regression. The non-linear regression analysis determined the pre-interference period (PIP), the critical period for interference prevention (CPIP) and the total interference prevention period (TIP). The relevant species were Nicandra physaloides, Digitaria nuda and Raphanus raphanistrum. The TIP was similar in both planting seasons. The CPIP was 38 and 33 days in summer planting and winter planting, respectively. The PIP had six more days in winter planting compared to summer planting. The higher dry mass in weeds reduced yield by 14.7 % in winter planting, in relation to the summer planting, but the reduction was faster in this season. Winter planting conferred a certain competitive advantage to the crop over some weed species, thus it could be suggested planting common bean in that season.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Biology São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, CEP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Plant Production São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, CEP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Plant Production National Agrarian University La Molina, CEP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Biology São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, CEP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Plant Production São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, CEP-
Formato: dc.format902-909-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationAustralian Journal of Crop Science-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectcompetition-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectinterference periods-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectPhaseolus vulgaris L.-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectphytosociology-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectsustainable weed management-
Título: dc.titlePlanting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.