Evaluation and Feasibility of Different Models and Methods for Composite Simulation Using Ansys

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorTechnical Course in Electromechanics at Etec – Professor Alfredo de Barros Santos – CEETEPS-
Autor(es): dc.contributorMechanical Engineering Department of Technological University of Peru-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBonhin, Eduardo Pires-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMüzel, Sarah David-
Autor(es): dc.creatorOliveira, Geraldo Cesar Rosario de-
Autor(es): dc.creatorTupinambá, Walter Luiz Medeiros-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGuidi, Erick Siqueira-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSilva, Carlos Alexis Alvarado-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSilva, Fernando de Azevedo-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T18:30:57Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T18:30:57Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2025-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2024-07-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/298953-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/298953-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe utilization of composite materials in various engineering sectors has gained significant prominence due to their unique characteristics. However, owing to their inherent heterogeneity, these materials often exhibit nonlinear and unpredictable behaviors. Consequently, the finite element method has seen a growing application as an invaluable tool for analyzing composites subjected to diverse scenarios. This study aims to assess the advantages and disadvantages of ANSYS APDL and Workbench modules (specifically, ACP and Static Structural) while also examining the impact of the choice of elements in simulating composite materials. The results obtained reveal that, irrespective of the chosen method and element type, the strain patterns exhibited remarkable similarity. Nonetheless, models employing shell elements demonstrated a notable advantage, requiring fewer elements and nodes. Furthermore, the recommended model is the integrated ACP model. This preference is based in its capacity to simplify layer modeling and enable the detailed analysis of strains within each layer.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Guaratinguetá-
Descrição: dc.descriptionTechnical Course in Electromechanics at Etec – Professor Alfredo de Barros Santos – CEETEPS, Guaratinguetá-
Descrição: dc.descriptionMechanical Engineering Department of Universidade Estadual Paulista, Guaratinguetá-
Descrição: dc.descriptionMechanical Engineering Department of Technological University of Peru-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Guaratinguetá-
Descrição: dc.descriptionMechanical Engineering Department of Universidade Estadual Paulista, Guaratinguetá-
Formato: dc.format918-924-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationIAENG International Journal of Computer Science-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCarbon Fibers-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectFinite Element-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectMaterials-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectPolyphenylene Sulfide Composite-
Título: dc.titleEvaluation and Feasibility of Different Models and Methods for Composite Simulation Using Ansys-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.