Surface smoothness of resin composites after polishing—A systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorBraz Cubas University-
Autor(es): dc.contributorA. T. Still University-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Oliveira, Ananda Gomes-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRocha, Rafael Santos-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSpinola, Manuela da Silva-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBatista, Graziela Ribeiro-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBresciani, Eduardo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCaneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T18:08:46Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T18:08:46Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-07-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-07-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-04-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12921-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/249655-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/249655-
Descrição: dc.descriptionA systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed to provide evidence for the best polishing protocol for different types of resin composites to minimize surface roughness. A search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BBO, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library on July 2, 2019 (updated in December, 2020). In vitro studies that included at least two systems for polishing resin composites and analyzed surface roughness were included. The risk of bias was evaluated. A random-effects Bayesian-mixed treatment comparison model was used to compare surface roughness in resin composites with the different types of polishers. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis was performed to rank the probability for the best polishing system. After removal of duplicates, title and abstract screening yielded 34 studies. Network meta-analysis was not possible for hybrid and microhybrid composites. SUCRA analysis showed that abrasive paper discs allowed greater surface smoothness for nanohybrid and nanofill composites to a probability of between 83% and 91.6%. Silicon carbide brush had a 78.2% probability of being the best system for microfill composites. The use of abrasive paper disc polishers showed a favorable result in nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites. Silicon carbide brush has a greater chance of promoting a smoother surface for microfill resin composites.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Braz Cubas University, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Missouri School of Dentistry and Oral Health A. T. Still University, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University, São Paulo-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectcomposite resins-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectdental polishing-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectnetwork meta-analysis-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectpermanent dental restoration-
Título: dc.titleSurface smoothness of resin composites after polishing—A systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typevídeo-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.