Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorInternational Research Group for Energy Sustainability (IRGES)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMariños Rosado, Diego J.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMendiburu, Andrés Z.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Carvalho, João A.-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T19:28:28Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T19:28:28Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-07-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-07-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-01-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/248112-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/248112-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe present article a natural gas combined cycle thermoelectric power plant, without/with supplementary fuel burning (SFB), was evaluated through an energetic, exergetic, environmental and economic analysis. The objective of this research is to show that the lower energy production related to the system without SFB is compensated by the higher environmental efficiency. The evaluations were carried out to determine the global efficiency and the energy benefits/losses from the different equipment. The environmental analysis determined all emissions, pollution indicator (Πg), and ecological efficiency (ε) considering the international air quality standards. Finally, the economic analysis determined the expected annual benefit due to the pay-back and the electricity production cost (PCEE), incorporating the effects of the environmental impacts. When developing the present study, the system without/with SFB evidenced a global efficiency of 50.81 % vs 47.39 %, respectively. In addition, the system without SFB showed better results of exergetic efficiency and irreversibility, its Πg and ε were 0.056 kg/MJ and 93.2 %. While its total emissions were 16 % lower. The economic analysis verified the annual benefit due to the pay-back for an annual interest rate of 4 %, 8 % and 12 %, and the PCEE showed an increase between 10 % and 12 % in the case with SFB.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionMechanical Engineering Faculty São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Ariberto P. Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá - SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), R. Sarmento Leite 425, Porto Alegre - RS-
Descrição: dc.descriptionInternational Research Group for Energy Sustainability (IRGES), R. Sarmento Leite 425, Porto Alegre - RS-
Descrição: dc.descriptionMechanical Engineering Faculty São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Ariberto P. Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá - SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFAPESP: 2017/08975-1-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationThermal Science and Engineering Progress-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCombined cycle-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectEcological efficiency-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectElectricity production cost-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSupplementary fuel burning-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectThermoelectric power plant-
Título: dc.titleEnergy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.