Which Histometric Analysis Approach Is More Reliable for Assessing Histological Bone Tissue Samples?

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity of Grande Rio-UNIGRANRIO-
Autor(es): dc.contributorTufts University School of Dental Medicine-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity “G. D’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara-
Autor(es): dc.contributorStony Brook University-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorFederal Fluminense University-
Autor(es): dc.contributorSan Raffaele Hospital-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPereira, Rodrigo dos Santos-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMourão, Carlos Fernando-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPiattelli, Adriano-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRomanos, Georgios E.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCoelho Mendes, Bruno-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGiubilato, Flavio-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMontemezzi, Pietro-
Autor(es): dc.creatorJúnior Conforte, Jadson-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGriza, Geraldo Luiz-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBonardi, João Paulo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorHochuli-Vieira, Eduardo-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T19:39:08Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T19:39:08Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-07-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-07-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-10-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101364-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/247793-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/247793-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThis study aims to evaluate the grid of Merz and ImageJ methods for histometric quantification, verifying which is more reliable and defining which is most suitable based on the time required to perform. Thirty histological samples of maxillary sinuses grafted with xenografts were evaluated using an optical light microscope attached to an image capture camera and connected to a microcomputer. The images were digitalized and recorded as a TIFF image, and the new bone formation was evaluated using the grid of Merz and ImageJ. The Bland–Altman analysis was used to identify the agreement between the methods and determine suitable future research options. The timing of the quantification was also performed to identify a possible advantage. The mean value for the quantification analysis timing for the grid of Merz was 194.9 ± 72.0 s and for ImageJ was 871.7 ± 264.4, with statistical significance between the groups (p = 0.0001). The Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated a concordance between the methods, due to the bias being next to the maximum concordance (−1.25) in addition to the graphic showing the scattering points next to the mean of differences and inside of limits of agreement. Thus, it was demonstrated that the grid of Merz presents reliable outcomes and advantages over the ImageJ methodology regarding the time spent to contour the areas of interest.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery University of Grande Rio-UNIGRANRIO-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Periodontology Dental Research Administration Tufts University School of Dental Medicine-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Medical Oral and Biotechnological Sciences University “G. D’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSchool of Dental Medicine Stony Brook University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Aracatuba School of Dentistry Sao Paulo State University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionClinical Research Laboratory in Dentistry Federal Fluminense University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dentistry San Raffaele Hospital-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Diagnostic and Surgery Aracatuba School of Dentistry Sao Paulo State University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Aracatuba School of Dentistry Sao Paulo State University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Diagnostic and Surgery Aracatuba School of Dentistry Sao Paulo State University-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationMedicina (Lithuania)-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectBland–Altman analysis-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjecthistological measurement-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjecthistomorphometric analysis-
Título: dc.titleWhich Histometric Analysis Approach Is More Reliable for Assessing Histological Bone Tissue Samples?-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.