Prevalence and factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction in university women: a cross-sectional study

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorCentro Universitário de Adamantina (UNIFAI)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorIamundo, Luana Fávaro-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Aquino Nava, Guilherme Thomaz-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRocha, Paulo Roberto-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPrudencio, Caroline Baldini-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBarbosa, Angélica Mércia Pascon-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T21:59:28Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T21:59:28Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-07-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-07-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/fm.2022.35133-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/245924-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/245924-
Descrição: dc.descriptionIntroduction: Urinary incontinence (UI), fecal incontinence (FI), and genito-pelvic pain or penetration disorder (GPPPD) are considered pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), and are mainly characterized by poor functionality of the pelvic floor muscles. Despite the relevance of these dysfunctions in women's lives, the demand for care is low. Objective: To analyze the prevalence of PFD, in university women, and factors associated with PFD. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted at São Paulo State University, Marília, SP, Brazil, with undergraduate and/ or postgraduate women aged over 18 years. An online questionnaire containing 40 open and multiple-choice questions about PFD was developed by the authors and a Google form was disclosed via social media (Facebook, Instagram) to the participants. The questionnaire was applied between April and July 2020. Results: A sample of 707 participants was included. The average age was 22.5 ± 21.0 years old. The most prevalent PFD was GPPPD, reported by 30.7% of women, followed by UI (16.8%) and FI (3.2%). PFD was significant less reported in the Midwest region compared to other regions (p = 0.015) and significantly more prevalent in women who attended public university (p = 0.038), in women with UI, FI, and GPPPD. The association-test showed that attending public university showed association to UI (p < 0.001), FI (p = 0.008) and GPPPD (p = 0.006). In addition, parity showed association with GPPD (p = 0.032) and to attend health courses with UI (p = 0.002). Conclusion: PFD is prevalent among university women and GPPPD was the most recurrent, followed by UI and FI. GPPPD was associated with parity and attending a public university. UI was associated with attending public university and health courses. FI was associated with attending a public university-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCentro Universitário de Adamantina (UNIFAI), SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFAPESP: 2016/01743-5-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Idioma: dc.languagept_BR-
Relação: dc.relationFisioterapia em Movimento-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectPelvic floor disorders-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectPhysiological sexual dysfunction-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectUniversity-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectUrinary incontinence-
Título: dc.titlePrevalence and factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction in university women: a cross-sectional study-
Título: dc.titlePrevalência e fatores associados à disfunção do assoalho pélvico em mulheres universitárias: um estudo transversal-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.