Is There a Rationale for Author Byline Order? A Case Study of the Journal of Informetrics

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidad de León-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee-
Autor(es): dc.creatorHilário, Carla Mara-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGrácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMartínez-Ávila, Daniel-
Autor(es): dc.creatorWolfram, Dietmar-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T15:45:35Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T15:45:35Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-03-02-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-03-02-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2022.3.1890-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/242041-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/242041-
Descrição: dc.descriptionMultiple authorship on research publications is common in many disciplines. Is the order in which authors appear in the byline determined by consistent criteria? This study investigated co-authored papers published in the Journal of Informetrics in 2016, the year in which this representative journal of the area of informetrics started to publish the articles with the author contributions form, as a case study to determine if there is consistency in the author order based on author contributions. For the papers studied, there was greater consistency for the first and last authors, and less consistent rationale for the order of the remaining author positions for the papers studied. A survey sent to the authors of the publications studied revealed that authors believed the first and last author positions played a more distinctive role. The lack of agreement and function of author order in other positions raises the question about the significance of author order and its purpose in determining the credit authors receive for co-authored publications.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual de Londrina-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidad de León-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationRevista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectAuthor contribution-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectAuthor credit-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectByline order-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCo-authorship-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectInformetrics-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectResearch collaboration-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectScholarly communication-
Título: dc.titleIs There a Rationale for Author Byline Order? A Case Study of the Journal of Informetrics-
Título: dc.title¿Existe una justificación para el orden de los autores en la mención de autoría? Un estudio de caso de la investigación en informetría-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.