Comparison between connective tissue graft and xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix to treat single gingival recession: A data reanalysis of randomized clinical trials

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity of Maryland School of Dentistry-
Autor(es): dc.contributorCollege of Dentistry-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMiguel, Manuela Maria Viana-
Autor(es): dc.creatorFerraz, Laís Fernanda Ferreira-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRossato, Amanda-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCintra, Tuana Mendonça Faria-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSantamaria, Mauro Pedrine-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T20:15:47Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T20:15:47Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-03-02-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-03-02-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12936-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/241910-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/241910-
Descrição: dc.descriptionObjectives: There are few studies comparing xenogeneic acellular dermal matrixes (XDMs) with connective tissue graft (CTG) to treat single gingival recession (GR). The present study involved a reanalysis of previous studies and comparison of CTG or XDM to treat single RT1/GR. Materials and methods: Fifty patients from three previous randomized clinical trials treated either by CTG (n = 25) or XDM (n = 25) were evaluated after 6-month. Clinical, patient-centered, and esthetic parameters were assessed. Pearson's correlation and regression analyses were also performed. Results: Greater recession reduction (RecRed), percentage of root coverage (%RC), and complete root coverage (CRC) were observed in the CTG group (p ≤ 0.02). Gingival thickness (GT) and keratinized tissue width (KTW) gains were higher in the CTG group. The CTG group showed better esthetic at 6-month. Logistic analyses reported that GT([OR] = 1.6473) and papilla height (PH) (OR = 8.20) are predictors of CRC. GT*XDM interaction was a negative predictor of CRC (OR = 7.105−5). GT at baseline acted as a predictor of RecRed in both groups (p = 0.03). The XDM graft impacted RecRed and %RC negatively. Baseline PH was a predictor of %RC for both grafts. Conclusion: CTG was superior for treating RT1/GR, providing better root coverage outcomes and tissue gains over time. GT, PH, and graft type were classified as predictors of CRC. Clinical significance: CTG presented better outcomes to treat single RT1 gingival recession when compared to the XDM.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDivision of Periodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDivision of Operative Dentistry Dept. of General Dentistry University of Maryland School of Dentistry-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversity of Kentucky College of Dentistry-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDivision of Periodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectconnective tissue graft(s)-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectdental-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectesthetics-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectgingival recession-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectheterografts-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectmucogingival surgery-
Título: dc.titleComparison between connective tissue graft and xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix to treat single gingival recession: A data reanalysis of randomized clinical trials-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.