Influence of different root canal obturation materials in CBCT imaging: An in vitro evaluation

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorFaculdade de Odontologia-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSalineiro, Fernanda Cristina Sales-
Autor(es): dc.creatorVelasco, Solange Kobayashi-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBarros, Fabiana Mesquita-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSalzedas, Leda Maria Pescinini-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSales, Marcelo Augusto Oliveira-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCavalcanti, Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T20:10:28Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T20:10:28Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-03-02-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-03-02-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14436/2358-2545.11.1.054-062.oar-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/241809-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/241809-
Descrição: dc.descriptionObjective: This study evaluated the influence of canal obturation materials in the production of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images artifact, by means of image density analysis and comparison between four materials in central incisors and monoradicular premolar teeth. Materials and Methods: The teeth were submitted to endodontic instrumentation and divided into 5 groups: one control group (no endodontic filling) and four test groups each one filled by a different endodontic sealer (PulpCanal Sealer, AHPlus, Sealer26 and BCSealer). After CBCT scanning, the images were assessed to determine grayscale variations in three root thirds (objective analysis). The second (subjective) analysis compared the control group with two of the test groups in a randomized process. Results: In the objective analysis, Sealer26 and BCSealer showed statistical difference for minimum values, in comparison with another sealers, for both anterior and posterior teeth. For maximum values, only control group differed statistically from test groups. When comparing premolars and central incisors grayscale values by ANOVA analysis, a statistically significant difference was found mainly for minimum values. At the subjective analysis, for both anterior and posterior teeth, PulpCanal Sealer was the filling most frequently appointed by the observers as the one that produced more artifact interference. Conclusion: Endodontic fillings at posterior teeth performed similar behavior. Only PulpCanal Sealer on apical third presented higher maximum values in relation to others groups, which could represent more white brands. For anterior teeth, BC Sealer performed higher minimum values in relation to other endodontic fillings, which could represent more dark bands.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade de São Paulo Departamento de Estomatologia Faculdade de Odontologia-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Departamento de Patologia e Propedêutica Clínica“ Faculdade de Odontologia-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Federal da Paraiba Departamento de Radiologia Faculdade de Odontologia-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Departamento de Patologia e Propedêutica Clínica“ Faculdade de Odontologia-
Formato: dc.format54-62-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationDental Press Endodontics-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDiagnosis-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectEndodontics-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectOral-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectRoot Canal Obturation-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectTomography-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectX-Ray Computed-
Título: dc.titleInfluence of different root canal obturation materials in CBCT imaging: An in vitro evaluation-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.