Social evaluation of municipal solid waste management systems from a life cycle perspective: a systematic literature review

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorFundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV EAESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorFederal University of Technology of Paraná-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCosta, Alline Marchesin-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMancini, Sandro Donnini-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPaes, Michel Xocaira-
Autor(es): dc.creatorUgaya, Cássia Maria Lie-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Medeiros, Gerson Araujo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Souza, Ricardo Gabbay-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T16:45:20Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T16:45:20Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-03-01-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-03-01-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-05-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02057-6-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/241649-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/241649-
Descrição: dc.descriptionPurpose: The social aspects of municipal solid waste management (MSWM) systems are underpinning their sustainability and effectiveness. The assessment of these systems from a life cycle perspective is widespread throughout environmental life cycle assessment (LCA), but few studies have used social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). The present study is an innovative review with the objective to analyse and describe the current level of development of S-LCA applications in MSWM, and to identify the main methodological challenges and best practices, aiming at recommending approaches to harmonise future S-LCA applications in MSWM. Materials and methods: A systematic review of the literature found 36 relevant scientific articles. These were submitted to bibliometric and content analysis, which includes an analysis of how methodological aspects of the four phases of S-LCA were applied in comparison with best practice and existing guidelines. Results and discussion: There was a predominance of case studies in developing countries (59%) and evaluation of the stages of collection/transportation, pre-processing (sorting) and landfilling (55%). There were more studies focusing on stakeholders, “workers” and “local communities” and in the impact subcategories “employment”, “working hours”, “health and safety/working conditions”, “community involvement/participation” and “health and safety/living conditions of community”. There was great variability in the application of the method (47% of the studies included methodological developments). However, the 39% based on UNEP guidelines were closer to a methodological consensus. Conclusion: In general, studies need more detail and clarity in describing the methodological decisions used. Improvements are needed for issues that limit the S-LCA method, including the difficulties of covering the entire life cycle, relating impacts to the functional unit, standardizing impact assessment methods, addressing allocation and data quality issues and interpretation of results and their limitations. Improvements can be achieved by using participatory methods in the selection of categories, subcategories and impact indicators, as well as by clarifying the definition of a product system and detailing “cut-off criteria” of processes/organizations and the impact of these decisions on results.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSchool of Engineering São Paulo State University (Unesp), Av. Eng. Luís Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01 - Vargem Limpa, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionInstitute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp), Av. 3 de março, 511, Altos da Boa Vista, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSão Paulo School of Management Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV EAESP), Rua Itapeva, 474 - 7° andar, Bela Vista, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Mechanical Federal University of Technology of Paraná, Rua Deputado Heitor Alencar Furtado EM 306 –Ecoville, 5000, Paraná-
Descrição: dc.descriptionInstitute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp), Rodovia Presidente Dutra Km 137.8, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSchool of Engineering São Paulo State University (Unesp), Av. Eng. Luís Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01 - Vargem Limpa, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionInstitute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp), Av. 3 de março, 511, Altos da Boa Vista, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionInstitute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp), Rodovia Presidente Dutra Km 137.8, São Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCAPES: 88882.432855 / 2019-01-
Formato: dc.format719-739-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectLife cycle assessment-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectMunicipal solid waste-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectS-LCA-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSocial impact-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSocial life cycle assessment-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSocietal LCA-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectWaste management-
Título: dc.titleSocial evaluation of municipal solid waste management systems from a life cycle perspective: a systematic literature review-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typevídeo-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.