Tissue response to different incision tools in animal model

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorTorres-Augusto Neto, Renato-
Autor(es): dc.creatorComachio, Cássio Amaro-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Almeida, Lilian Caldas Quirino-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Azambuja Carvalho, Pedro Henrique-
Autor(es): dc.creatordos Santos Trento, Guilherme-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPereira-Filho, Valfrido Antônio-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T22:44:47Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T22:44:47Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-03-01-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-03-01-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01105-7-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/241453-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/241453-
Descrição: dc.descriptionPurpose: The aim of this study is to compare the repair of incisions performed with microdissection electrocautery tip, conventional electrocautery tip, high potency diode laser, and conventional scalpel blade in a in vivo model. Methods: Different incisions were performed in adults Holtzman rats using the four types of instruments: microdissection electrocautery tip, conventional electrocautery tip, high potency diode laser, and conventional scalpel blade, in different periods of healing process. Thirty rats were divided into 5 groups, according to the period of euthanasia—24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 7 days, and 14 days. All animals received four incisions, each by a different method. Quantitative histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed using hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and Picrosirius Red staining. Results: Inflammatory profile and tissue repair presented small statistically significance differences comparing conventional scalpel blade and microdissection tip; moreover, both presented quantitatively superior to the others. Conclusion: It is believed that the microdissection tip can perform a dynamic incision just as a common scalpel blade, but more effective. Furthermore, it can promote a better hemostatic control of the surgical field that is comparable to conventional electrocautery tip without affecting tissue repair.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSchool of Dentistry Araraquara - Diagnosis and Surgery Department São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Humaitá, 1680 - Centro - Araraquara, SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSchool of Dentistry Araraquara - Diagnosis and Surgery Department São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Humaitá, 1680 - Centro - Araraquara, SP-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationOral and Maxillofacial Surgery-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDiode laser-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectElectrocoagulation-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectMicrodissection-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSurgical wound-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectWound healing-
Título: dc.titleTissue response to different incision tools in animal model-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.