Impact of long-term care facilities’ size on adherence to COVID-19’ infection prevention guidance

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorWachholz, Patrick Alexander-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMelo, Ruth Caldeira de-
Autor(es): dc.creatorJacinto, Alessandro Ferrari-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBoas, Paulo José Fortes Villas-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T22:45:10Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T22:45:10Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-03-01-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2023-03-01-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.5581.3516-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/240205-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/240205-
Descrição: dc.descriptionObjective: to evaluate the adherence of Brazilian long-term care facilities to the World Health Organization Infection Prevention and Control guidance, and assess the association of their size with the adherence to these recommendations. Method: cross-sectional study conducted with facilities’ managers. Authors developed a 20-item questionnaire based on this guidance, and a global score of adherence, based on the adoption of these recommendations. Adherence was classified as (1) excellent for those who attended ≥14 out of 20 recommendations; (2) good for 10 to 13 items; and (3) low for those with less than ten items. Facilities’ sizes were established as small, intermediate, and large according to a two-step cluster analysis. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used at a 5% significance level. Results: among 362 included facilities, 308 (85.1%) adhered to 14 or more recommendations. Regarding its size, adherence to screening COVID-19 symptoms of visitors (p=0.037) and isolating patients until they have had two negative laboratory tests (p=0.032) were lower on larger ones compared to medium and small facilities. Conclusion: adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures in Brazilian facilities was considered excellent for most of the recommendations, regardless of the size of the units.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade de São Paulo Escola de Artes Ciências e Humanidades, SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Federal de São Paulo Escola Paulista de Medicina, SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, SP-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Idioma: dc.languagept_BR-
Idioma: dc.languagees-
Relação: dc.relationRevista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectAged-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCoronavirus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCOVID-19-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectGuideline Adherence-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectHomes for the Aged-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectLong-Term Care-
Título: dc.titleImpact of long-term care facilities’ size on adherence to COVID-19’ infection prevention guidance-
Título: dc.titleImpacto del tamaño de las instituciones de larga estancia en la adhesión a las orientaciones de prevención de infecciones por COVID-19-
Título: dc.titleImpacto do tamanho das instituições de longa permanência na adesão às orientações de prevenção de infecções por COVID-19-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.