Effects of automatic mechanical peripheral stimulation on gait biomechanics in older adults with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized crossover clinical trial

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUSC-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUCM-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMarques, Nise Ribeiro-
Autor(es): dc.creatorKuroda, Marina Hiromi-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMoreno, Vinicius Christianini-
Autor(es): dc.creatorZámuner, Antonio Roberto-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBarbieri, Fabio Augusto-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T17:12:44Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T17:12:44Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-05-01-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-05-01-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-022-02075-2-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/234352-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/234352-
Descrição: dc.descriptionBackground: Automated mechanical peripheral stimulation (AMPS) is a rehabilitation technique suggested to correct gait abnormalities on Parkinson’s disease. Although previous studies have suggested increments in functional performance and gait speed after AMPS intervention, little is known about its effect on gait biomechanics. Objective: To analyze the effect of an AMPS session on functional performance and gait biomechanics in subjects with Parkinson’s disease. Methods: Twenty-eight subjects aged 67±3 years old participated in this study. Kinematics and muscle activation were recorded during walking at a preferred gait speed before and after AMPS and sham interventions. Footswitches sensors were used to record the kinematic parameters. Electromyographic (EMG) signals of tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) were recorded. Timed up and go (TUG) test and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) were performed to assess functional performance. Results: GL activation increased after AMPS intervention before and after heel strike (p = 0.04; p < 0.01) and before and after toe-off (p = 0.013; p = 0.038). Also, after AMPS intervention, TA activation increased after heel strike (p = 0.007); and after sham intervention, TA activation reduced before and after heel strike (p = 0.038; and p = 0.007) and before toe-off (p = 0.013). The time of TUG test was shorter after AMPS intervention (p = 0.015). Conclusion: AMPS intervention changed the EMG activation of ankle muscles during walking and functional performance. However, AMPS intervention did not change gait kinematics.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCenter of Healthy Science Universidade do Sagrado Coração USC, Rua Irmã Arminda, 10-50, SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Physical Education São Paulo State University UNESP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionLaboratorio de Investigación Clínica en Kinesiología Department of Kinesiology Universidad Católica del Maule UCM-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Physical Education São Paulo State University UNESP-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationAging Clinical and Experimental Research-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectBiomechanics-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectElectromyography-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectKinematics-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectPhysical therapy-
Título: dc.titleEffects of automatic mechanical peripheral stimulation on gait biomechanics in older adults with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized crossover clinical trial-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.