Retrospective evaluation about morse taper versus external hexagon implants placed after maxillary sinus lift

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBarros-Filho, Luiz A.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDe Oliveira, Guilherme J.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBarros, Luiz A.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMarcantonio, Elcio-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T18:37:04Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T18:37:04Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-05-01-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-05-01-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-01-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.21.04533-2-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/234301-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/234301-
Descrição: dc.descriptionBACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the success and survival rate of implants with different types of prosthetic connections inserted in the posterior maxilla in native bone or in sinuses previously grafted with different biomaterials. METHODS: A total of 310 implants inserted in 113 patients were evaluated, 87 of which were inserted in association with grafted maxillary sinuses (56 morse taper (MT) implants and 31 external hexagon (EH) implants) in 37 patients, and 223 implants were inserted in native bone areas (112 MT and 111 EH implants) in 76 patients. Peri-implant clinical analyses were performed (bleeding on probing, probing depth, clinical insertion level, peri-implant marginal level, and the presence of mobility or suppuration), and the radiographic bone level was evaluated. RESULTS: Two implants were lost, yielding a survival rate of 99.35%. The MT implants had lower probing depths and peri-implant bone levels than the EH implants in both grafted areas and native bone areas (P<0.05). No statistically significant differences in any parameter evaluated were found between implants inserted in native bone and those inserted in grafting areas. EH implants inserted in native bone areas showed higher peri-implantitis rates. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that the MT implants connection reduce peri-implant bone loss, but implants inserted in maxillary sinuses previously grafted with osteoconductive biomaterials do not predispose patients to periimplant bone loss.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSchool of Dentistry Department of Periodontology/Implantology Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Formato: dc.format10-15-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationMinerva Dental and Oral Science-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectBone transplantation-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectMaxillary sinus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectOsseointegration-
Título: dc.titleRetrospective evaluation about morse taper versus external hexagon implants placed after maxillary sinus lift-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.