Good scientific practice: A behavior-analytical discussion

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGuazi, Taísa Scarpin-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLaurenti, Carolina-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCarrara, Kester-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T19:54:19Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T19:54:19Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-30-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-30-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2018-01-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/232857-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/232857-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe publication of a report with guidelines of good scientific practice by CNPq in 2011 is considered one of the milestones in the discussion on integrity in science in Brazil. The objective of this work was to discuss such guidelines under a behavioral approach, considering them as rules. Although rules offer advantages to the acquisition of good practices by researchers, the teaching of morality should not be restricted to the exposure of these professionals to these guidelines, but provide conditions for them to be sensitive to the different ethical issues that may arise in the context of the production of scientific knowledge. The analysis of the document published by CNPq also shows that the consequences of misconduct and good practices in science are postponed and nonspecific. On the other hand, the consulted literature correlates scientific fraud with the demands of scientific productivity: in some cases, the misconduct seems to allow the researcher to adapt to the demands of productivity. Moreover, consequences associated with academic productivity contingencies are more immediate and may, therefore, exert more control over the behavior of the scientist. The discussion about scientific fraud, in this sense, implies considering the current academic contingencies.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho-
Formato: dc.format1-9-
Idioma: dc.languagept_BR-
Relação: dc.relationInteracao em Psicologia-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectBehavioral analysis-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectFraud-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectGuideline adherence-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectScience-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectScientific misconduct-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectTechnology legislation-
Título: dc.titleGood scientific practice: A behavior-analytical discussion-
Título: dc.titleBoas práticas científicas: Uma discussão analítico-comportamental-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.