Four challenges when conducting bibliometric reviews and how to deal with them

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRomanelli, João Paulo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGonçalves, Maria Carolina Pereira-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Abreu Pestana, Luís Fernando-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSoares, Jéssica Akemi Hitaka-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBoschi, Raquel Stucchi-
Autor(es): dc.creatorAndrade, Daniel Fernandes-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T17:31:24Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T17:31:24Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16420-x-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/229538-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/229538-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe evidence base in environmental sciences is increasing steadily. Environmental researchers have been challenged to handle massive volumes of data to support more comprehensive studies, assess the current status of science, and move research towards future progress. Bibliometrics can provide important insights into the research directions by providing summarized information for several end users. Here, we present an in-depth discussion on the use of bibliometric indicators to evaluate research outputs through four case studies comprising disciplines in environmental sciences. We discuss four big challenges researchers may face when conducting bibliometric reviews and how to deal with them. We also address some primary questions researchers may answer with bibliometric mapping, drawing lessons from the case studies. Lastly, we clarify some misuses of review concepts and suggest methodological principles of systematic reviews and maps to improve the overall quality of bibliometric studies.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionLaboratory of Ecology and Forest Restoration (LERF) “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture University of São Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias, 11-
Descrição: dc.descriptionLaboratory of Enzymatic Technology (LabEnz) Department of Chemical Engineering Federal University of São Carlos, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235-
Descrição: dc.descriptionAgronomic Sciences College (FCA) Forest Science Department São Paulo State University, Av. Universitária, 3780-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSecretariat for Environmental Management and Sustainability (SGAS) Federal University of São Carlos, Rod. Washington Luís, km 235-
Descrição: dc.descriptionGroup of Applied Instrumental Analysis Department of Chemistry Federal University of São Carlos, Rod. Washington Luís, km 235-
Descrição: dc.descriptionAgronomic Sciences College (FCA) Forest Science Department São Paulo State University, Av. Universitária, 3780-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectBibliometric indicators-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectBibliometric mapping-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCase studies-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectEnvironmental sciences-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectNetwork analysis-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectResearch trends-
Título: dc.titleFour challenges when conducting bibliometric reviews and how to deal with them-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typevídeo-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.