Flapless Guided Implant Surgeries Compared with Conventional Surgeries Performed by Nonexperienced Individuals: Randomized and Controlled Split-Mouth Clinical Trial

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorFAESA-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity of Michigan School of Dentistry-
Autor(es): dc.creatorFrizzera, Fausto-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCalazans, Nicolas Nicchio Nicolini-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPascoal, Cristiano Hooper-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMartins, Menara Elen-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMendonça, Gustavo-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T21:55:54Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T21:55:54Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-29-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8722-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/229496-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/229496-
Descrição: dc.descriptionPurpose: The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of flapless guided surgery related to surgery, patient, operator, assistant, and advisor, comparing it with conventional surgery performed by undergraduate students who had never placed implants in patients. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial was carried out. Ten patients with bilateral mandibular posterior tooth loss received an implant on each side with conventional flap surgery or flapless guided surgery that was performed by undergraduate students. Surgery time, pain, patient satisfaction, quantity of consumed medications, time of procedure, ease of procedure, anxiety, and stress were assessed. Results: Conventional surgery showed statistically significantly inferior results compared with flapless guided surgery in terms of procedure time (56 minutes, 36 seconds ± 8 minutes, 38 seconds vs 30 minutes, 1 second ± 6 minutes, 2 seconds), consumption of analgesic medications (49 tablets vs 15 tablets), intraoperative (1.75 ± 1.56 vs 0.65 ± 0.64) and postoperative pain (4.62 ± 2.17 vs 1.17 ± 0.72), and operator anxiety (4.76 ± 1.66 vs 3.47 ± 1.50), respectively. Conclusion: Flapless guided implant surgeries performed by individuals with no previous clinical experience showed reduced surgery time and delivered better patient-reported outcomes both in the intraoperative and postoperative periods; reduced medication consumption; and showed better results in the operator and assistant perspectives-
Descrição: dc.descriptionPeriodontics and Implantology FAESA-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery FOAr/UNESP Department of Clinical Dentistry FAESA-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Clinical Dentistry FAESA-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Biologic and Materials Sciences and Prosthodontics University of Michigan School of Dentistry-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery FOAr/UNESP Department of Clinical Dentistry FAESA-
Formato: dc.format755-761-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subject3D-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectcomputer-guided surgery-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectdental implant-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectflapless procedure-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectsurgical guide-
Título: dc.titleFlapless Guided Implant Surgeries Compared with Conventional Surgeries Performed by Nonexperienced Individuals: Randomized and Controlled Split-Mouth Clinical Trial-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.