Surface roughness and bacterial adherence to resin composites and ceramics

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorFederal University of Santa Maria-
Autor(es): dc.contributorAlma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorKantorski, Karla Zanini-
Autor(es): dc.creatorScotti, Roberto-
Autor(es): dc.creatorValandro, Luiz Felipe-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBottino, Marco Antonio-
Autor(es): dc.creatorKoga-Ito, Cristiane Yumi-
Autor(es): dc.creatorJorge, Antonio Olavo-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T22:44:33Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T22:44:33Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2009-01-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.a15264-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/225561-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/225561-
Descrição: dc.descriptionPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness and the in vitro adherence of Streptococcus mutans to indirect aesthetic restorative materials that are uncoated with saliva. Materials and Methods: Four groups of restorative materials were evaluated according to material type: (1) microparticulate feldspathic ceramic; (2) leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic; (3) microhybrid resin composite and (4) microfilled resin composite. Twenty standardised samples of each material were produced. Roughness analysis (Ra, n = 10) was performed using a roughness analyser. Adhesion tests (n = 10) were carried out in 24-well plates; colony-forming units (CFU/mL) were evaluated. The mean values of roughness (lm) and adherence (CFU/mL) for each group were subjected to an analysis of variance and a Tukey test. Results: The leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic was rougher and presented higher bacterial adherence than the microparticulate feldspathic ceramic. The resin composites were similar with regard to surface roughness and bacterial adherence. Conclusions: The microhybrid and microfilled resin composites were similar and the leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic was rougher and presented higher bacterial adherence than the microparticulate feldspathic ceramic.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDivision of Periodontology Department of Stomatology School of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria, Rua Marechal Floriano 1184-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDivision of Prosthodontics Department of Oral Sciences Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via San Vitale 59-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDivision of Prosthodontics Department of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria, Rua Marechal Floriano 1184-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São José dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, Av. Francisco José Longo 777-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis São José dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, Av. Francisco José Longo 777-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São José dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, Av. Francisco José Longo 777-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis São José dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, Av. Francisco José Longo 777-
Formato: dc.format29-32-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationOral Health and Preventive Dentistry-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCeramic-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectResin composite-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectStreptococcus mutans-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSurface roughness-
Título: dc.titleSurface roughness and bacterial adherence to resin composites and ceramics-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.