Dexmedetomidina e sufentanil como analgésicos per-operatórios. Estudo comparativo

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCurtis, Fábio Geraldo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCastiglia, Yara Marcondes Machado-
Autor(es): dc.creatorStolf, Andrea Albres-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRonzella, Erick-
Autor(es): dc.creatorVanni, Simone Maria DAngelo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDo Nascimento Jr., Paulo-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T21:52:06Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T21:52:06Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2002-09-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/224279-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/224279-
Descrição: dc.descriptionBackground and Objectives - The use of α2-agonists to control heart rate and blood pressure, to attenuate hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation and extubation and to reduce anesthetics requirement are already well established in the literature since clonidine introduction for therapeutic use. Dexmedetomidine, recently approved for clinical use, presents more α2-adrenergic receptors selectively, and therefore less adverse effects combined with marked analgesic and sedative properties. This has raised the interest in using it to replace opioids, known for their potent analgesic and sedative properties. This study aimed at comparing dexmedetomidine and sufentanil analgesia's during continuous infusion for ENT, head and neck procedures. Methods - Sixty patients were randomly distributed in two groups of 30: G1 - sufentanil and G2 - dexmedetomidine, for anesthetic induction and maintenance. Nitrous oxide and propofol in a target controlled continuous infusion were also used for anesthetic maintenance. The following parameters were evaluated: hemodynamic variables (systolic, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate), emergence and extubation times after propofol withdrawal, place where patients were extubated (operating room - OR, or post-anesthetic recovery unit - PACU), PACU stay, Aldrete Kroulik index, and OR or PACU complications. Results - G1 had lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, lower heart rate values, longer emergence and extubation times, higher number of PACU extubations, longer PACU stay, lower Aldrete-Kroulik index and higher number of peri and post-operative complications. Conclusions - Dexmedetomidine as intraoperative analgesic was more effective as compared to sufentanil in the procedures selected for this study regarding hemodynamic stability, emergence and anesthetic recovery conditions.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartamento de Anestesiologia FMB UNESP, Botucatu, SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDept. de Anestesiologia FMB UNESP, 18618-970 Botucatu, SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartamento de Anestesiologia FMB UNESP, Botucatu, SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDept. de Anestesiologia FMB UNESP, 18618-970 Botucatu, SP-
Formato: dc.format525-534-
Idioma: dc.languagept_BR-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectAnalgesics, Opioids: sufentanil-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDrugs: dexmedetomidine-
Título: dc.titleDexmedetomidina e sufentanil como analgésicos per-operatórios. Estudo comparativo-
Título: dc.titleDexmedetomidine and sufentanil as intraoperative analgesics. Comparative study-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.