Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing indirect versus direct composite restorations: A randomized clinical trial

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRocha Gomes Torres, Carlos-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCaroline Moreira Andrade, Adrielle-
Autor(es): dc.creatorValente Pinho Mafetano, Ana Paula-
Autor(es): dc.creatorStabile de Abreu, Fabrícia-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Souza Andrade, Danilo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCintra Mailart, Mariane-
Autor(es): dc.creatorAun de Barros Lima Rocha Campello de Souza, Maria Luíza-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGuimarães Alarça Nunes, Lilian-
Autor(es): dc.creatorAriel Rodrigues de Araújo, Carlos-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDi Nicoló, Rebeca-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBühler Borges, Alessandra-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T20:01:13Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2025-08-21T20:01:13Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12820-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/222529-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/222529-
Descrição: dc.descriptionObjective: This study compared the clinical performance of large indirect restorations (IRs) versus direct restorations (DRs) in posterior teeth. Methods: Thirty subjects received two class II restorations (n = 60), one fabricated from a precured composite block (Grandio Blocs, VOCO) for the indirect technique (IT) and the other with light-cured composite (GrandioSO, VOCO) for the direct technique (DT). For IT, the restoration was created using the computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturer (CAD/CAM) system. For DT, the material was applied light-cured by using a layering technique. All restorations were evaluated by using the World Dental Federation criteria. Results: Twenty-three subjects attended the 2-year recall, and 46 restorations were evaluated. No significant differences were detected between the techniques for most parameters analyzed (p > 0.05). For “color match” at 7 days and 6 months, better results were observed for the DT. In relation to the overall scores, all restorations were esthetically acceptable after 2 years, while 93.3% of DT and 90% of IT showed acceptable function. For biological scores, 96.67% of DRs and 100% of IRs was acceptable after 24 months. Considering all properties, the success rates were 93.3% for DRs and 90% for IRs. Conclusions: After 2 years, both restorations presented similar and good clinical behavior for all the properties analyzed. Clinical significance: Light-cured direct posterior composite restorations may perform similarly to indirect composite restorations made with precured CAD/CAM composite blocks up to 2 years.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University—UNESP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University—UNESP-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCAD/CAM-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectclinical trial-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectcomposite-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectindirect restoration-
Título: dc.titleComputer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing indirect versus direct composite restorations: A randomized clinical trial-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.