Comparative study of the effectiveness and residual effect of preoperative antisepsis with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate associated with 70% ethyl alcohol and 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate in dogs

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorCentro Universitário Ingá (UNINGÁ)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias (FCAV)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBoeing, Joseneia-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPires, Amanda Marcondes-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLavelli, Danielli Aparecida-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Moraes, Gabriel Godoi-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMoraes, Paola Castro-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRomani, Isaac-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Castro Sasahara, Taís Harumi-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLeal, Leonardo Martins-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T22:10:34Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-08-04T22:10:34Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-06-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21708/avb.2021.15.2.9801-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/222016-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/222016-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe effectiveness of antisepsis of surgical sites in 20 animals (canine species) was compared and subdivided into two groups, using 4% chlorhexidine gluconate associated with alcohol (group 1) and 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate (group 2). The samples were collected through skin swab after trichotomy (T1), after definitive antisepsis (T2) and one hour after the use of antiseptic (T3), and then submitted to the count of colony forming units (CFU). In both groups, bacterial growth occurred in T1; in T2, the reduction of CFUs was significant for both groups (G1 and G2); however, if we consider absolute values, we can see in T1 a greater amount of CFUs in G2, and when evaluating the results of T2, we can see values which are very similar between G1 and G2, which may suggest greater efficiency of G2 in initial times after antisepsis. In T3, the reduction of CFUs was more effective for G1, suggesting a greater residual effect when compared to G2. Both antiseptic protocols were effective as they significantly reduced the number of skin bacteria, both in T2 and T3.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCentro Universitário Ingá (UNINGÁ), PR-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias (FCAV), SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ), SP-
Formato: dc.format161-165-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationActa Veterinaria Brasilica-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectAntiseptic-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSmall animals-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSurgical field-
Título: dc.titleComparative study of the effectiveness and residual effect of preoperative antisepsis with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate associated with 70% ethyl alcohol and 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate in dogs-
Título: dc.titleEstudo comparativo da eficácia e do efeito residual da antissepsia pré-operatória com gluconato de clorexidina 4% associado a álcool etílico 70% e gluconato de clorexidina alcoólico 0,5% em cães-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.