Sequential methodology for the selection of sanitary landfill sites: A comparison with a traditional method

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMazzuco, Giulia G.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSouza, Natália C.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorOliveira, Vinícius G.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGobbo, Caio A.R.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMoreira, Emerson R.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLollo, José A. [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLorandi, Reinaldo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMoschini, Luiz E.-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T22:08:33Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-08-04T22:08:33Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2019-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2020.105347-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/221442-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/221442-
Descrição: dc.descriptionA sequential methodological approach for sanitary landfill sites selection is proposed. Spatial data were processed in a GIS platform using multi-criteria decision analysis (analytic hierarchy process, boolean, fuzzy, and weighted sum). A traditional weighted sum method was compared to the sequential method proposed herein. Using weighted sum, 57.98% of the area results propitious versus 8.98% using the sequential method. Strong variation also occurs in the areas classified as restrictive, which increases from 0.60% to 26.01%. Most significant differences occurred in urban areas neighbouring and areas high slope areas with rocky outcropping substrate (strong restriction to sanitary landfills implantation). Once traditional method results average classes, areas with strong restriction for one attribute can be selected. In sequential method, the overlapping of the environmental, legal and operational attributes results more consistent classification, more conservative socio-environmental evaluation, reducing environmental impacts mitigation needs and decreasing the management risks and general enterprise costs.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Civil Engineering Federal University of São Carlos-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Civil Engineering São Paulo State University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFederal University of São Carlos-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Environmental Sciences Federal University of São Carlos-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Civil Engineering São Paulo State University-
Formato: dc.format141-158-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationInternational Journal of Environment and Waste Management-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectAnalytic hierarchy process-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectEnvironment-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectGeographic information system-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectHydrographic basin-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectMethod comparison-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectMulti-criteria analysis-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectRio Claro hydrographic basin-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSanitary landfill-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSequential methodological-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSites selection-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectWaste management-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectWeighted sum-
Título: dc.titleSequential methodology for the selection of sanitary landfill sites: A comparison with a traditional method-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.