Beyond subsumption and balancing: A critique of proportionality theory from the case of freedom of speech

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade do Estado de São Paulo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRibeiro, Caio Gentil-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T22:08:24Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-08-04T22:08:24Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2019-01-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.12957/publicum.2019.30353-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/221395-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/221395-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThis article criticizes Robert Alexy’s Proportionality Theory. After describing the structure of such theory, the article addresses its use regarding freedom of speech; more precisely, it deals with the relations between freedom of speech and abusive advertising and between freedom of speech and financing of electoral campaigns. The criticisms to proportionality are drawn from Ronald Dworkin’s approach on how rights must be defined and from the method John Rawls uses to build his theory of justice, and stress how Alexy’s theory, despite its intended neutrality, is incompatible with these two substantive approaches. It is argued, then, that this incompatibility is the result of the presumption that there is no other form of legal reasoning besides the dichotomy subsumption/balancing. Finally, it is suggested that the use of proportionality as a way of justification undermines the legitimacy of law as a means of coercion.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversidade do Estado de São Paulo Departamento de Filosofia e Teoria Geral do Direito-
Formato: dc.format221-237-
Idioma: dc.languagept_BR-
Relação: dc.relationPublicum-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectAlexy-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDworkin-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectFreedom of speech-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectProportionality-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectRawls-
Título: dc.titleBeyond subsumption and balancing: A critique of proportionality theory from the case of freedom of speech-
Título: dc.titlePara além da subsunção e do sopesamento: Uma crítica à teoria da proporcionalidade a partir do caso da liberdade de expressão-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.