Up scaling guava water balance in the Petrolina/Juazeiro growing area, northeast Brazil

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDe Teixeira, A. H.C.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorHernandez, F. B.T.-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T22:03:11Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-08-04T22:03:11Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2012-09-30-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/219874-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/219874-
Descrição: dc.descriptionWeather data for 2011, from a net of 15 automatic agro-meteorological stations and previous field energy balance results, were used together with regression models for modelling the guava water requirement (GWR) in the growing area of Petrolina (Pernambuco state) - Juazeiro (Bahia state), Brazil, considering a 6.5-months average growing season (GS). GWRGS joined with rainfall, allowed the acquirement of the regional water balance and the application of a guava water indicator (GWIGS) calculated as the ratio of the total precipitation during a growing season (PGS) to GWRGS. The variation of the averaged GWRGS values for Petrolina, was from 750±6.9 to 950±10.5 mm, while for Juazeiro, it was from 730±6.2 to 900±9.2 mm, with pruning periods in January and June, respectively. Considering the GWIGS indicator, its values for both municipalities were found similar, which were around 0.38 and 0.08 for pruning done in January and June, respectively. Quantifying the differences between PGS and GWRGS, it was evident that a higher amount of irrigation water needed to be applied between September and October for growing cycles starting in June. Additional data from IBGE (Brazilian Geographical and Statistical Institute) allowed the inspection of the guava water productivity (GWP) at the municipality level. The GWP values for Petrolina were 4.1 and 3.3 kg m-3, while for Juazeiro they were 1.8 and 1.5 kg m-3, for pruning periods in January and June, respectively. It could be concluded that the lower GWP values for Juazeiro was because of a poorer crop management, resulting in lower yield, evidencing scope for improvements. The analyses spatially presented, can subsidize water allocation and irrigation management criteria, when aiming improvements on guava water productivity and yet, avoiding environmental damage by the fast climate and land use changes in the Brazilian semi-arid areas. © ISHS.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionEmbrapa Tropical Semi-arid, Petrolina, PE-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSão Paulo University State, Ilha Solteira, SP-
Formato: dc.format193-200-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationActa Horticulturae-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCrop coefficient-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectModelling-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectPaloma-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectWater productivity-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectWater requirements-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectWater resources-
Título: dc.titleUp scaling guava water balance in the Petrolina/Juazeiro growing area, northeast Brazil-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.