Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorFaculdade de Odontol. de Piracicaba-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorAmaral, Cristiane M.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorHara, Anderson Takeo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPimenta, Luiz André Freire-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRodrigues Jr., Antonio Luiz-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T22:01:09Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-08-04T22:01:09Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-04-28-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2001-02-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/219251-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/219251-
Descrição: dc.descriptionPurpose: To investigate the microleakage of four hydrophilic adhesive systems: one multiple-bottles (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus); two one-bottle (Single Bond, Stae); and one self-etching (Etch & Prime 3.0). Materials and Methods: 120 bovine incisor teeth were divided into four groups (n = 30) and Class V cavities were prepared at the cemento-enamel junction. The cavities were restored with the adhesive systems and with Z100 composite. The teeth were thermocycled 1,000 times between 5 ± 2°C and 55 ± 2°C with a dwell time of 1 min, and then placed in a 2% methylene blue dye (pH 7.0) for 4 hrs, washed and sectioned vertically through the center of the restorations. The qualitative evaluation was made by three examiners who distributed pre-established scores (0-4) for each tooth using a stereomicroscope at x30 magnification. Results: In enamel margins little microleakage was observed and the Kruskal-Wallis analysis did not show differences. In dentin margins the Kruskal-Wallis and multiple comparison analyses were applied: microleakage was significantly greater with Stae (median 3) and Scotchbond MP Plus (median 4). Single Bond (median 1) and Etch & Prime 3.0 (median 2) showed the best results in dentin margins, and the statistical analysis did not demonstrate differences in microleakage among these groups.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFaculdade de Odontol. de Piracicaba, Av. Limeira, 901, CEP 13414-018 Piracicaba - SP-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry of Piracicaba University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba-
Descrição: dc.descriptionBiostatistic and Sci. Methodology School of Dentistry of Araraquara State University of São Paulo, Araraquara-
Formato: dc.format31-33-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationAmerican Journal of Dentistry-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Título: dc.titleMicroleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.