Atenção: Todas as denúncias são sigilosas e sua identidade será preservada.
Os campos nome e e-mail são de preenchimento opcional
Metadados | Descrição | Idioma |
---|---|---|
Autor(es): dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | - |
Autor(es): dc.creator | Rocha, R. S. [UNESP] | - |
Autor(es): dc.creator | Carvalho, V. G. de [UNESP] | - |
Autor(es): dc.creator | Galvao, M. N. C. [UNESP] | - |
Autor(es): dc.creator | Souza, M. Y. de [UNESP] | - |
Autor(es): dc.creator | Caneppele, T. M. F. [UNESP] | - |
Autor(es): dc.creator | Bresciani, E. [UNESP] | - |
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-04T21:58:46Z | - |
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available | 2022-08-04T21:58:46Z | - |
Data de envio: dc.date.issued | 2022-04-28 | - |
Data de envio: dc.date.issued | 2022-04-28 | - |
Data de envio: dc.date.issued | 2021-03-01 | - |
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/20-011-C | - |
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218651 | - |
Fonte: dc.identifier.uri | http://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/218651 | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different illuminants on the perceptibility and acceptability of surface gloss variations and to determine limiting values. Methods: Eight composite resin specimens and one human tooth specimen were polished to obtain composite resin specimens with different gloss units (GU) of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 and a human tooth specimen of 80 GU. Sixty observers compared the surface gloss of the specimens in a light booth. For perceptibility testing, the specimens were randomly positioned two at a time. The acceptability of the gloss variation was determined by comparing the composite resin specimens with the tooth specimen. The observers answered specific questions to determine the level and perceptibility and acceptability limits of gloss variations. All analysis was done with two illuminants (D65 and fluorescent light) used randomly. Data were submitted to a nonlinear probit model and nonlinear probit regression estimation (alpha=0.05). Results: Significant differences in illuminants were observed for perceptibility (p<0.001) and acceptability (p=0.045). The perceptibility limit for D65 was 7.0 GU and 6.8 GU for fluorescent illuminant. The acceptability limit for D65 was 34.2 GU and 37.1 GU for fluorescent illuminant. Conclusions: More accurate perceptibility and acceptability judgments of the surface gloss of composite resin were made when the specimens were illuminated with D65 light. | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil | - |
Descrição: dc.description | FAPESP: 2016/22953-8 | - |
Formato: dc.format | E98-E104 | - |
Idioma: dc.language | en | - |
Publicador: dc.publisher | Operative Dentistry Inc | - |
Relação: dc.relation | Operative Dentistry | - |
???dc.source???: dc.source | Web of Science | - |
Título: dc.title | Perceptibility and Acceptability of Surface Gloss Variation Under Different Illuminants | - |
Tipo de arquivo: dc.type | livro digital | - |
Aparece nas coleções: | Repositório Institucional - Unesp |
O Portal eduCAPES é oferecido ao usuário, condicionado à aceitação dos termos, condições e avisos contidos aqui e sem modificações. A CAPES poderá modificar o conteúdo ou formato deste site ou acabar com a sua operação ou suas ferramentas a seu critério único e sem aviso prévio. Ao acessar este portal, você, usuário pessoa física ou jurídica, se declara compreender e aceitar as condições aqui estabelecidas, da seguinte forma: