Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUPE – University of Pernambuco-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRosa, Cleber Davi Del Rei Daltro [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Souza Leão, Rafaella-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGuerra, Cátia Maria Fonseca-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSilva Casado, Bruno Gustavo da-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMoraes, Sandra Lúcia Dantas de-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T00:53:46Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-02-22T00:53:46Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-06-25-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-06-25-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.03.002-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/208567-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/208567-
Descrição: dc.descriptionObjective: This review is to compare patient-satisfaction with ball-type overdenture attachment systems with others attachment systems. Material and methods: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018097234) and adheres the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for published articles were performed before October 2020. The PICO question was: “Do patients with a ball-type overdenture retention system have greater satisfaction, when compared to other attachment systems?” The evaluation of risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: After searching the databases, seven articles were selected out of a total of 2583. A total of 312 implants were placed in 139 patients, with a mean age of 65.9 years. The risk of bias in the included studies varied according to the different domains in a risk of uncertain bias or low bias risk. No difference was found between the ball attachment systems and the others systems, with respect to patient-satisfaction. The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between the ball systems and another systems (P = 0.11; MD: 10.90; 95% CI: −2.55 to 24.35). Conclusions: Regarding patient general satisfaction, it was not possible to determine differences between the ball system and another types of attachment system for overdenture. The ball-type system was statistically superior only to the magnet system.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Dentistry School UNESP – São Paulo State University, R: José Bonifácio, 1193, Vila Mendonça-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDentistry School UPE – University of Pernambuco, Av. General Newton Cavalcanti, 1650, Tabatinga-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Prosthodontics Dentistry School Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Dentistry School UNESP – São Paulo State University, R: José Bonifácio, 1193, Vila Mendonça-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationSaudi Dental Journal-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCross-over studies-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDenture precision attachment-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectOverdenture-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectPatient-satisfaction-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectProsthodontics-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSystematic review-
Título: dc.titleDo ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.