Efficacy of the Pilates versus general exercises versus educational workshops on neuromuscular parameters: A randomized controlled trial

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMendes Tozim, Beatriz [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorThomaz de Aquino Nava, Guilherme [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorZuliani Stroppa Marques, Ana Elisa [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorTavella Navega, Marcelo [UNESP]-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T00:53:18Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-02-22T00:53:18Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-06-25-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-06-25-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-04-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.08.012-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/208394-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/208394-
Descrição: dc.descriptionIntroduction: Muscle strength, flexibility and changes in muscle recruitment patterns are usually associated to low back pain (LBP). Physical exercises can reverse the adverse changes associated to LBP. Objectives: Compare Pilates, general exercises and educational workshop on muscle flexibility, strength and recruitment of the trunk extensor muscles in women with LBP. Methods: Forty-six women were randomly divided into Pilates group (PG, n = 16), general exercise group (GEG, n = 15), and educational group (EG, n = 15). This study sought to determine flexibility, muscle strength, and muscle recruitment of right (RIL), left (LIL) iliocostalis lumbar; right (RMU) and left (LMU) lumbar multifidus muscles. Both PG and GEG performed 16 exercise sessions, while EG attended 4 workshops. Statistical analysis used data sample from Shapiro-Wilk test, Pearson's correlation, multivariate analysis, mixed variance analysis, and Cohen's index. Results: Flexibility showed no differences (p > 0.05). Muscle strength increased in the intragroup analysis for PG (p = 0.003) and GEG (p = 0.002); however, the intergroup analysis presented no difference. Intergroup showed statistically significant differences for the recruitment of RMU in PG (p < 0.001). Intragroup analysis presented differences after interventions in PG for RIL (p = 0.001); in GEG for LIL (p = 0.005); and in EG for RIL (p = 0.007), LIL (p = 0.002) and RMU (p < 0.001). Conclusions: None of the groups showed flexibility improvements. PG and GEG increased muscle strength through intragroup analysis. Intergroup analysis showed an increase in recruitment of the RMU muscle in PG and all groups demonstrated significant improvements in the intragroup analysis.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFaculty of Philosophy and Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Physical Education Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFaculty of Philosophy and Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Physical Education Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)-
Formato: dc.format420-427-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationJournal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectAging-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectArticular-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectElectromyography-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectExercise movement techniques-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectLow back pain-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectPhysical therapy specialty-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectRange of motion-
Título: dc.titleEfficacy of the Pilates versus general exercises versus educational workshops on neuromuscular parameters: A randomized controlled trial-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.