Agroecological innovation constructing socionatural order for social transformation: two case studies in Brazil

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorOpen University-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLevidow, Les-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSansolo, Davis [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSchiavinatto, Monica [UNESP]-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T00:49:59Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-02-22T00:49:59Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-06-25-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-06-25-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2020.1843318-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/207359-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/207359-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe Green Revolution exemplifies the capital-intensive modernization model of resource plunder and labor exploitation. This has provoked small-scale producers and civil society groups to counterpose an agroecology-based solidarity economy (EcoSol-agroecology), especially in Latin America. But their efforts encounter dominant models–of innovation, management, markets, nature, etc.–which limit alternatives. To clarify a transformative agenda, advocates have elaborated agroecological innovation through several complementary practices. Nature is framed as agri-biodiversity complementing socio-cultural diversity. Short food-supply chains (circuitos curtos) build consumer support for production methods enhancing producers' livelihoods, providing socio-economic equity and conserving natural resources. Through diálogos de saberes, i.e. knowledge exchange among farmers and with external experts, cultivation and water-management methods are designed or adapted as socio-environmental technologies. Capacities are built for collective self-management of those solidarity relationships. In such ways, agroecological innovation co-produces specific forms of nature, technoscientific knowledge and society; their practices construct a distinctive socionatural order. Such order arises through several instruments–making identities, institutions and discourses–as understood by STS co-production theory. Here this theory illuminates two Brazilian agroforestry initiatives whose cooperative practices seek to transform their own participants' lives and wider agri-food systems. By combining diverse sources, composite cultures deepen the social basis of territorial belonging.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionArts and Humanities Research Council-
Descrição: dc.descriptionGlobal Challenges Research Fund-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDevelopment Policy and Practice (DPP) Group School of Social Sciences and Global Studies (SSGS) Open University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionInstituto de Políticas Públicas e Relações Internacionais (IPPRI) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionInstituto de Políticas Públicas e Relações Internacionais (IPPRI) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationTapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectagroecological innovation-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectBrazil-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectsocio-environmental technologies-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectsolidarity economy-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSTS co-production theory-
Título: dc.titleAgroecological innovation constructing socionatural order for social transformation: two case studies in Brazil-
Título: dc.titleLa innovación agroecológica construyendo el orden socionatural para la transformación social: dos estudios de caso brasileños-
Título: dc.titleInovação agroecológica construindo ordem socionatural para transformação social: dois estudos de caso brasileiros-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.