Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: Influence of the post systems and cements

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorFACID WYDEN-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDe Matos, Luanne-
Autor(es): dc.creatorOliveira, Lucas [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSilva, Aryvelto [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSilva, Jessica [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSilva, Marcelo-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T00:44:52Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-02-22T00:44:52Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-06-25-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-06-25-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-10-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.302888-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/205632-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/205632-
Descrição: dc.descriptionBackground: Endodontically treated teeth with extensive structural damage present higher fragility due to the low amount and worse quality of the reminiscent tissues of the crown. Materials and Methods: The present in vitro study evaluated the effect of different intraradicular retainers and cementation agents on the fracture resistance of devitalized teeth. Incisive teeth (n = 40) of bovine mandibles were used. After preparation of the root canals, they were immersed in polyether, in a polyvinyl chloride cylinder containing acrylic resin, to simulate the periodontal ligament. The specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10), according to the type of retainer (anatomical or main with accessory posts) and resin cement used (conventional resin cement-RelyX ARC or self-adhesive resin cement-RelyX U200). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C and submitted to fracture resistance testing. ANOVA and Tukey's test were applied for data analysis, with significance level set at 5%. Results: There was no interaction between cement type and intraradicular retainers (P = 0.56) or even between the types of cement used (P = 0.65). However, in the variation of the types of retainers, the group using main with accessory posts presented greater resistance to the fracture than the anatomical post (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Different cementing agents have no effect on the fracture strength of devitalized teeth, unlike the use of posts, in which the use of accessory post proved more resistant when compared to the anatomical post.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Prosthesis and Periodontics School of Dentistry Campinas University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics School of Dentistry Saõ Paulo State University (Unesp), 1680 Humaita Street, Centro-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Saõ Paulo State University (Unesp)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dentistry School of Dentistry Wyden Educational Group FACID WYDEN-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics School of Dentistry Saõ Paulo State University (Unesp), 1680 Humaita Street, Centro-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Saõ Paulo State University (Unesp)-
Formato: dc.format417-423-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationDental Research Journal-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDental cements-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectdental pins-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjecttooth fractures-
Título: dc.titleResistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: Influence of the post systems and cements-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.