Marginal and internal adaptation of lithium disilicate partial restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity Center of Pará (CESUPA)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBastos, Natália Almeida-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBitencourt, Sandro Basso [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCarneiro, Renan Figueiredo-
Autor(es): dc.creatorFerrairo, Brunna Mota-
Autor(es): dc.creatorStrelhow, Samira Sandy Ferreira-
Autor(es): dc.creatordos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBombonatti, Juliana Fraga Soares-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T00:44:03Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-02-22T00:44:03Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-06-25-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2021-06-25-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-10-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_112_20-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/205332-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/205332-
Descrição: dc.descriptionAim: The aim of this meta analysis was to evaluate the influence of the processing method on the marginal and internal gaps of lithium disilicate inlays/onlays. Settings and Design: A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. This review was registered on the PROSPERO platform. Materials and Methods: The studies were selected according to the marginal and internal gaps of two different fabrication methods for lithium disilicate (milled and pressed). Statistical Analysis Used: The meta analysis was performed based on the Mantel–Haenszel and inverse variance methods, using the random effects model and a 95% confidence interval. Results: From all databases, 127 studies were identified. Four in vitro studies were included in the qualitative analysis and three in the meta analysis. Moreover, 197 restorations were evaluated (103 pressed and 94 milled). During the evaluation of only the internal gap, there was a statistically significant difference favoring the pressed technique (P = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in the analyses of the marginal gap (P = 0.530) and the total gap (P = 0.450). Conclusion: Both the techniques provided acceptable marginal and total gaps, although the pressed technique revealed a more favorable internal adaptation than the milled onlays/inlays.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartments of Operative Dentistry Endodontics and Dental Materials University of Sao Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionProsthodontics and Periodontology Bauru School of Dentistry University of Sao Paulo-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics University Center of Pará (CESUPA)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry-
Formato: dc.format338-344-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationJournal of Indian Prosthodontic Society-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCeramics-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectComputer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDental materials-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectLaboratory technology-
Título: dc.titleMarginal and internal adaptation of lithium disilicate partial restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.