Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorFederal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity of New England – UNE-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRomanzini, Eliéder Prates [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBarbero, Rondineli Pavezzi-
Autor(es): dc.creatorReis, Ricardo Andrade [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorHadley, David-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMalheiros, Euclides Braga [UNESP]-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T00:34:39Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-02-22T00:34:39Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-09-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/201836-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/201836-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThis study aimed to evaluate different scenarios (year, supplementation level) about economic results of beef cattle production during rearing and finishing phase in Brazilian’s tropical pastures. Four scenarios were evaluated in combination with fourteen supplements, and it was originated from some research developed inside Forage Crops and Grasslands section from São Paulo State University among years 2011 and 2014. The economic evaluation was analyzed by operating cost, total operational costs, gross revenue, operating profit, and financial net income. Besides profitability, internal rate of return (IRR), benefit/cost ratio (B:C), and simple payback period (SPP) were calculated too. During rearing phase, the best result was observed for scenario 2 (2012), supplement 3.2 (mineral mix) with values of 11 cycles, 26.3%, 9.30%, and 0.39 for SPP, profitability, IRR, and B:C ratio, respectively. Already to finishing phase, the best scenario was 3 (2013), supplement 10 (multiple supplement with supplementation level equal 1.0% body weight), which obtained 4 cycles, 68.7%, 27.00%, and 2.34 for the same variables above mentioned. Results were consistent being that higher IRR and profitability occurred when using low supplementation level. Hence, the economic responses from different scenarios (years and supplements) can alter the final livestock farm financial statement.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSão Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” – Unesp, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane s/n-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Animal Production Institute of Animal Husbandry Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), 238.970-00, Seropédica-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversity of New England – UNE-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSão Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” – Unesp, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane s/n-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCNPq: 142188/2016-6-
Formato: dc.format2659-2666-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationTropical Animal Health and Production-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDry season-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectSupplementation-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectTotal operational costs-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectWet season-
Título: dc.titleEconomic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.