Does the prosthesis weight matter? 3D finite element analysis of a fixed implant-supported prosthesis at different weights and implant numbers

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorFaculty of Pindamonhangaba (FUNVIC)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorThe University of Amsterdam and Free University Amsterdam-
Autor(es): dc.creatorTribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Oliveira Dal Piva, Amanda Maria [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBorges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRodrigues, Vinicius Anéas-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorKleverlaan, Cornelis Johannes-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T00:34:26Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-02-22T00:34:26Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-04-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.67-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/201756-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/201756-
Descrição: dc.descriptionPURPOSE. This study evaluated the influence of prosthesis weight and number of implants on the bone tissue microstrain. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifteen (15) fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis designs were created using a modeling software with different numbers of implants (4, 6, or 8) and prosthesis weights (10, 15, 20, 40, or 60 g). Each solid was imported to the computer aided engineering software and tetrahedral elements formed the mesh. The material properties were assigned to each solid with isotropic and homogeneous behavior. The friction coefficient was set as 0.3 between all the metallic interfaces, 0.65 for the cortical bone-implant interface, and 0.77 for the cancellous bone-implant interface. The standard earth gravity was defined along the Z-axis and the bone was fixed. The resulting equivalent strain was assumed as failure criteria. RESULTS. The prosthesis weight was related to the bone strain. The more implants installed, the less the amount of strain generated in the bone. The most critical situation was the use of a 60 g prosthesis supported by 4 implants with the largest calculated magnitude of 39.9 mm/mm, thereby suggesting that there was no group able to induce bone remodeling simply due to the prosthesis weight. CONCLUSION. Heavier prostheses under the effect of gravity force are related to more strain being generated around the implants. Installing more implants to support the prosthesis enables attenuating the effects observed in the bone. The simulated prostheses were not able to generate harmful values of peri-implant bone strain.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and Technology-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dentistry Faculty of Pindamonhangaba (FUNVIC)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials Science Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) The University of Amsterdam and Free University Amsterdam-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and Technology-
Formato: dc.format67-74-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationJournal of Advanced Prosthodontics-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectBiomechanics-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectBone tissue-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDental implants-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectFinite element analysis-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectProsthodontics-
Título: dc.titleDoes the prosthesis weight matter? 3D finite element analysis of a fixed implant-supported prosthesis at different weights and implant numbers-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.