Quality switchingvs assessment platform-matched implants of systematic reviews an overview on platform

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUnisagrado-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity of Pernambuco (UPE)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSantiago, Joel Ferreira-
Autor(es): dc.creatorLemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorde Luna Gomes, Jéssica Marcela [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorVerri, Fellippo Ramos [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMoraes, Sandra Lucia Dantas-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T00:34:21Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-02-22T00:34:21Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-04-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00114-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/201733-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/201733-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe objective of this study was to perform a quality analysis of systematic reviews with meta-analyses that focused on the comparison of platform-switching (implant-abutment mismatching) and platform-matched (PM) implants. The assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) and Glenny (Checklist) Scales were used to qualify the studies. PubMed, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Web of Science (formerly ISI Web of Knowledge), and Cochrane databases were searched, by topic, for systematic reviews on dental implants with switching platforms. A total of 8 systematic reviews, including 7 studies with meta-analyses, were selected. The AMSTAR scale indicated a high (n ¼ 6) to moderate (n ¼ 2) score for the included studies. The quantitative analysis indicated that platform-switching implants preserved more bone tissue when compared with platform-matched implants (6 meta-analyses; P, .001, smaller mean difference: -0.29 mm, 95% CI: -0.38, -0.19 and greater mean difference: -0.49 mm, 95% CI: -0.73, -0.26). Quantitative analysis based on 7 systematic reviews with meta-analysis indicated positive peri-implant bone preservation for implants restored with an implant-abutment mismatching (PSW). Further, there is evidence to improve the design of current systematic reviews. Future systematic reviews in this thematic area should consider searches in gray literature and different databases and include only randomized controlled clinical studies.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionPró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação (PRPPG) Unisagrado-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDental School of Araçatuba UNESP—Universidade Estadual Paulista-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Prosthodontics Dentistry School University of Pernambuco (UPE)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDental School of Araçatuba UNESP—Universidade Estadual Paulista-
Formato: dc.format153-162-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationJournal of Oral Implantology-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectData pooling-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDental implant abutment design-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectMeta-analysis as topic-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectReview-
Título: dc.titleQuality switchingvs assessment platform-matched implants of systematic reviews an overview on platform-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.