Pelvic floor muscle training for women with lumbopelvic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity of Sydney-
Autor(es): dc.contributorThe University of Queensland-
Autor(es): dc.creatorVesentini, Giovana [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorPrior, Joanna-
Autor(es): dc.creatorFerreira, Paulo H.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorHodges, Paul W.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRudge, Marilza [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorFerreira, Manuela L.-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T00:32:17Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-02-22T00:32:17Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2019-12-31-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1636-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/200987-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/200987-
Descrição: dc.descriptionBackground and Objective: It has been suggested that pelvic floor dysfunction may contribute to the development of lumbopelvic pain as a result of changes in trunk muscle control. However, there is limited evidence that pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) can improve clinical outcomes in women with lumbopelvic pain. Databases and Data Treatment: Six databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of PFMT to other conservative interventions (usual physiotherapy care or minimal intervention), no treatment or placebo interventions on pain and disability in women with lumbopelvic pain. Results: We included eight RCTs totalling 469 participants. PFMT was more effective than minimal intervention for lumbopelvic pain [mean difference (MD) 15.9/100 (95% confidential interval (CI), 8.2 to 23.6; p = 0.00; I2 = 3.92%)] and disability [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.5 (95% CI 0.1–0.9; p = 0.00; I2 = 0%)] during pregnancy. PFMT was more effective than usual physiotherapy care for pain (MD 11.7/100 [95% CI 7.5–15.9; p = 0.00; I2 = 94.14%]) and disability (SMD 0.3 (95% CI 0.0–0.6; p = 0.01; I2 = 82.54%]) in non-pregnant women. Effect sizes were in general of arguable clinical relevance. Conclusions: Overall, the certainty of the evidence was very low to low. There is no conclusive evidence that the addition of PFMT to usual physiotherapy care or minimal intervention is superior to minimal intervention and usual care alone given the small number of studies and high levels of heterogeneity of included studies. Further well-designed trials are needed to establish the effectiveness of PFMT for lumbopelvic pain in women.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Botucatu Medical School UNESP – Univ Estadual Paulista-
Descrição: dc.descriptionInstitute of Bone and Joint Research The Kolling Institute Northern Clinical School Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDiscipline of Physiotherapy Faculty of Health Sciences University of Sydney-
Descrição: dc.descriptionCentre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain Injury and Health School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences The University of Queensland-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Botucatu Medical School UNESP – Univ Estadual Paulista-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationEuropean Journal of Pain (United Kingdom)-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Título: dc.titlePelvic floor muscle training for women with lumbopelvic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.